↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SET906+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:33:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 17.58s 2.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 17.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET906+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:25:16 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.46  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.58/2.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 17.58/2.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 17.58/2.74  fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) = 'set$uunion2'(X1,X0)).
% 17.58/2.74  fof(d2_tarski, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((X2 = 'unordered$upair'(X0,X1) <=> ! [X3] : ((in(X3,X2) <=> (X3 = X0 | X3 = X1)))))).
% 17.58/2.74  fof(d2_xboole_0, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((X2 = 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) <=> ! [X3] : ((in(X3,X2) <=> (in(X3,X0) | in(X3,X1))))))).
% 17.58/2.74  fof(d3_tarski, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((subset(X0,X1) <=> ! [X2] : ((in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)))))).
% 17.58/2.74  fof(t47_zfmisc_1, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((subset('set$uunion2'('unordered$upair'(X0,X1),X2),X2) => in(X0,X2)))).
% 17.58/2.74  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((subset('set$uunion2'('unordered$upair'(X0,X1),X2),X2) => in(X0,X2))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [t47_zfmisc_1])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c2, plain, 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) = 'set$uunion2'(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [commutativity_k2_xboole_0])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c3, plain, X0 != 'unordered$upair'(X1,X2) | X3(X1,X2,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_tarski])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c6, plain, ~X0(X1,X2,X3) | in(X4,X3) | X4 != X1, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_tarski])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c14, plain, X0 != 'set$uunion2'(X1,X2) | X3(X1,X2,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_xboole_0])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c18, plain, ~X0(X1,X2,X3) | in(X4,X3) | ~in(X4,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_xboole_0])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c25, plain, ~subset(X0,X1) | ~in(X2,X0) | in(X2,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_tarski])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c34, plain, subset('set$uunion2'('unordered$upair'(sK32,sK33),sK34),sK34), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(c35, plain, ~in(sK32,sK34), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d0, plain, subset('set$uunion2'(sK34,'unordered$upair'(sK32,sK33)),sK34), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [c34,c2])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d1, plain, in(X0,sK34) | ~in(X0,'set$uunion2'(sK34,'unordered$upair'(sK32,sK33))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c25,d0])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d2, plain, 'Ts12'(X0,X1,'set$uunion2'(X0,X1)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c14])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d3, plain, in(X0,'set$uunion2'(X1,X2)) | ~in(X0,X2), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,c18])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d4, plain, ~in(X0,'unordered$upair'(sK32,sK33)) | in(X0,sK34), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,d1])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d5, plain, 'Ts6'(X0,X1,'unordered$upair'(X0,X1)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c3])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d6, plain, in(X0,X1) | ~'Ts6'(X0,X2,X1), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c6])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d7, plain, in(X0,'unordered$upair'(X0,X1)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d5])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d8, plain, in(sK32,sK34), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d7,d4])).
% 17.58/2.74  cnf(d9, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c35,d8])).
% 17.58/2.74  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------