%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SET908+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:18 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.93s 3.67s
% Output : Refutation 6.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 14 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 21 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 163 ( 20 ~; 5 |; 7 &; 106 @)
% ( 5 <=>; 20 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 0 ^; 46 !; 4 ?; 50 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(set_union2_decl,type,
set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ set_union2 ) )
!= empty_set ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t49_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ set_union2 ) )
!= empty_set ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(14,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ set_union2 ) )
!= empty_set ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_xboole_0) ).
thf(84,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(92,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
<=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
| ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).
thf(53,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
| ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
| ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) )
=> ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) ) ) )
& ( ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) ) )
=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
| ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
| ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = empty_set )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( A = empty_set ) )
& ( ( A = empty_set )
=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ~ ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(81,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ empty )
=> ~ ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(80,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(18,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).
thf(87,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B
= ( A @ singleton ) )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
<=> ( C = A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( C = A )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( C = A ) ) )
=> ( B
= ( A @ singleton ) ) )
& ( ( B
= ( A @ singleton ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( C = A )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( C = A ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(90,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(95,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[14,20,84,92,53,44,81,80,18,87,23,90]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SET908+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.50 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.50 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.50 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.50 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.50 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.50 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:25:03 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.50 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.50 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.42/1.38 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.94/1.67 % [INFO] Parsing done (287ms).
% 1.94/1.69 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 3.14/2.32 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 3.14/2.34 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.33/2.48 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 11 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.47/2.53 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 11 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 3.47/2.57 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 3.47/2.58 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.47/2.59 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.93/3.67 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.93/3.67 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 5.93/3.67 % Time passed: 2946ms (effective reasoning time: 1966ms)
% 5.93/3.67 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.93/3.67 % Axioms used in derivation (11): d1_tarski, fc1_xboole_0, fc2_xboole_0, d1_xboole_0, commutativity_k2_xboole_0, rc1_xboole_0, idempotence_k2_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc3_xboole_0, d2_xboole_0
% 5.93/3.67 % No. of inferences in proof: 26
% 5.93/3.67 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2946 ms resp. 1966 ms w/o parsing
% 6.27/3.76 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.27/3.76 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------