↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET909+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  16   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (  12 sgn  22   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( A = empty_set
    <=> ! [B] : ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_union2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            | in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t50_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] : set_union2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',t50_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t50_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] : set_union2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t50_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,A)
    | empty_set != A ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( D != A
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,B)
    | in(D,C)
    | set_union2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    set_union2(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] : set_union2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = empty_set,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t50_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t50_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2)],[nnf_12]) ).

cnf(c_36,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t50_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_453,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) = empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set = set_union2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_453]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,A)
    | set_union2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) != A ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( A != C
    | in(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_454,plain,
    ~ in(A,set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_242,plain,
    ~ in(A,set_union2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_454]) ).

cnf(c_455,plain,
    in(set_union2(A,A),unordered_pair(B,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_246,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(B,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_455]) ).

cnf(c_277,plain,
    ( in(C,D)
    | set_union2(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) != D ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_456,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) = empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_37]) ).

cnf(c_457,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK1,empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_277,c_456]) ).

cnf(c_458,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK1,set_union2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_457]) ).

cnf(c_452,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_242,c_458]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET909+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:24:51 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.30  % Process 132209 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.03/0.30  % Sat Sep 26 08:24:51 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.30  
% 0.03/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/0.35  % Length of proof is 21.
% 0.14/0.35  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.14/0.35  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.14/0.35  % Given clauses 60.
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------