↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SET910+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:40:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   3   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  10   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t51_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(A,singleton(B)) = singleton(B)
     => in(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t51_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( set_intersection2(A,singleton(B)) = singleton(B)
       => in(B,A) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t51_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c8,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(A,singleton(B)) = singleton(B)
      & ~ in(B,A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c7]) ).

fof(c9,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5] :
      ( set_intersection2(X4,singleton(X5)) = singleton(X5)
      & ~ in(X5,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c8]) ).

fof(c10,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002)) = singleton(skolem0002)
    & ~ in(skolem0002,skolem0001) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c9]) ).

cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(skolem0002,skolem0001),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c10]) ).

fof(l30_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(A,singleton(B)) = singleton(B)
     => in(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l30_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c4,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(A,singleton(B)) != singleton(B)
      | in(B,A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l30_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c5,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( set_intersection2(X2,singleton(X3)) != singleton(X3)
      | in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c4]) ).

cnf(c6,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X60,singleton(X61)) != singleton(X61)
    | in(X61,X60) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5]) ).

cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002)) = singleton(skolem0002),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c10]) ).

cnf(c83,plain,
    in(skolem0002,skolem0001),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c11,c6]) ).

cnf(c86,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c83,c12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SET910+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed May  8 19:23:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.57  % Version:  1.5
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  % Initial clauses    : 15
% 0.21/0.57  % Processed clauses  : 28
% 0.21/0.57  % Factors computed   : 3
% 0.21/0.57  % Resolvents computed: 57
% 0.21/0.57  % Tautologies deleted: 3
% 0.21/0.57  % Forward subsumed   : 12
% 0.21/0.57  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.21/0.57  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.21/0.57  % User time          : 0.176 s
% 0.21/0.57  % System time        : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.57  % Total time         : 0.199 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------