↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET911+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.50s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SET911+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 16:32:24 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.47/0.54  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.50/0.57  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.57  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.50/0.57  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.50/0.57  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.50/0.57  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.50/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  % File     : SET911+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.50/0.57  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.50/0.57  % Problem  : in(A,B) => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A)
% 0.50/0.57  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.50/0.57  % English  :
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.50/0.57  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.50/0.57  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.50/0.57  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t52_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.50/0.57  % Rating   : 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.07 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.50/0.57  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   4 unt;   0 def)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of atoms       :   10 (   4 equ)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.50/0.57  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.57  %            Number of variables   :   12 (  10   !;   2   ?)
% 0.50/0.57  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.50/0.57  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.50/0.57      ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  fof(idempotence_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.50/0.57      ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,A) = A ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.50/0.57      ! [A,B] :
% 0.50/0.57        ( in(A,B)
% 0.50/0.57       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.50/0.57      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.50/0.57      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  fof(t52_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.50/0.57      ! [A,B] :
% 0.50/0.57        ( in(A,B)
% 0.50/0.57       => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  fof(l32_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.50/0.57      ! [A,B] :
% 0.50/0.57        ( in(A,B)
% 0.50/0.57       => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ) ).
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.50/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.57  %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.50/0.57  %VarNum:16(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.50/0.57  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.50/0.57  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.50/0.57  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.50/0.57  %goalClause: 11 15
% 0.50/0.57  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.50/0.57  [10]P1(a1)
% 0.50/0.57  [11]P2(a2,a4)
% 0.50/0.57  [14]~P1(a3)
% 0.50/0.57  [15]~E(f5(a4,f6(a2)),f6(a2))
% 0.50/0.57  [12]E(f5(x121,x121),x121)
% 0.50/0.57  [13]E(f5(x131,x132),f5(x132,x131))
% 0.50/0.57  [16]~P2(x162,x161)+~P2(x161,x162)
% 0.50/0.57  [17]~P2(x172,x171)+E(f5(x171,f6(x172)),f6(x172))
% 0.50/0.57  %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.57  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.50/0.57  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.50/0.58  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.50/0.58  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41,x43),f5(x42,x43))
% 0.50/0.58  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f5(x53,x51),f5(x53,x52))
% 0.50/0.58  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x61),f6(x62))
% 0.50/0.58  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.50/0.58  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.50/0.58  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.58  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.50/0.58     ($false),
% 0.50/0.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,15,17]),
% 0.50/0.58     ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.58  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------