↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SET911+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:57:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 10.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  12   ~;   4   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn  10   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t52_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
     => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t52_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l32_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
     => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l32_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f_6_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( in(A,B)
       => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[t52_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_6_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) != singleton(A)
      & in(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_6_1]) ).

fof(f_6_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_9,U_8] :
      ( set_intersection2(U_8,singleton(U_9)) != singleton(U_9)
      & in(U_9,U_8) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_6_2]) ).

fof(f_6_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_8] :
      ( set_intersection2(U_8,singleton(sK3)) != singleton(sK3)
      & in(sK3,U_8) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_9,sK3)],[f_6_3]) ).

fof(f_6_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(sK4,singleton(sK3)) != singleton(sK3)
    & in(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(U_8,sK4)],[f_6_4]) ).

fof(f_6_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(sK4,singleton(sK3)) != singleton(sK3)
    & in(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_6_5]) ).

cnf(f_6_7,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK3,sK4),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_6]) ).

cnf(f_6_8,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(sK4,singleton(sK3)) != singleton(sK3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_6]) ).

fof(f_7_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A)
      | ~ in(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l32_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_7_2,plain,
    ! [U_11,U_10] :
      ( set_intersection2(U_10,singleton(U_11)) = singleton(U_11)
      | ~ in(U_11,U_10) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_7_1]) ).

cnf(f_7_3,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(U_10,singleton(U_11)) = singleton(U_11)
    | ~ in(U_11,U_10) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_7_2]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    set_intersection2(sK4,singleton(sK3)) != singleton(sK3),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_6_8]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK3,sK4)
    | set_intersection2(sK4,singleton(sK3)) = singleton(sK3) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_7_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    in(sK3,sK4),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_6_7]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET911+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/10.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/10.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/10.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/10.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/10.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/10.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/10.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/10.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 23:09:23 UTC 2026
% 0.09/10.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/10.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/10.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------