↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET913+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.57s 3.29s
% Output   : Refutation 4.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  11   ~;   0   |;   5   &;  45   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0   ^;  18   !;   4   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(disjoint_decl,type,
    disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l25_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[13,17,22,8,19,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET913+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.26/0.52  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.26/0.52  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.26/0.52  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.26/0.52  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.26/0.52  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.26/0.52  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.26/0.52  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.26/0.52  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:25:18 UTC 2026
% 0.26/0.52  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/0.52  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.36/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.82/1.66  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (268ms). 
% 1.82/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.68/2.28  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.68/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.04/2.42  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.04/2.48  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.04/2.49  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 3.20/2.50  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.20/2.50  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.57/3.29  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.57/3.29  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.57/3.29  % Time passed: 2561ms (effective reasoning time: 1605ms)
% 4.57/3.29  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.57/3.29  % Axioms used in derivation (5): l25_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 4.57/3.29  % No. of inferences in proof: 14
% 4.57/3.29  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2561 ms resp. 1605 ms w/o parsing
% 4.91/3.35  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.91/3.36  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------