↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET914+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  37 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  44   ~;  45   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   4 sgn  45   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t55_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
        & in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
     => disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( X4 = X1
            | X4 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
          & in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t55_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X65,X66] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X65,X66)
      | disjoint(X66,X65) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_r1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)
    & in(esk6_0,esk8_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57,X58] :
      ( ( in(X54,X51)
        | ~ in(X54,X53)
        | X53 != set_intersection2(X51,X52) )
      & ( in(X54,X52)
        | ~ in(X54,X53)
        | X53 != set_intersection2(X51,X52) )
      & ( ~ in(X55,X51)
        | ~ in(X55,X52)
        | in(X55,X53)
        | X53 != set_intersection2(X51,X52) )
      & ( ~ in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X58)
        | ~ in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X56)
        | ~ in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X57)
        | X58 = set_intersection2(X56,X57) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X56)
        | in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X58)
        | X58 = set_intersection2(X56,X57) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X57)
        | in(esk3_3(X56,X57,X58),X58)
        | X58 = set_intersection2(X56,X57) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X60,X61] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X60,X61)
        | set_intersection2(X60,X61) = empty_set )
      & ( set_intersection2(X60,X61) != empty_set
        | disjoint(X60,X61) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d7_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( disjoint(X2,X1)
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40] :
      ( ( X38 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X39,X38) )
      & ( in(esk1_1(X40),X40)
        | X40 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_intersection2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49] :
      ( ( ~ in(X45,X44)
        | X45 = X42
        | X45 = X43
        | X44 != unordered_pair(X42,X43) )
      & ( X46 != X42
        | in(X46,X44)
        | X44 != unordered_pair(X42,X43) )
      & ( X46 != X43
        | in(X46,X44)
        | X44 != unordered_pair(X42,X43) )
      & ( esk2_3(X47,X48,X49) != X47
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X47,X48,X49),X49)
        | X49 = unordered_pair(X47,X48) )
      & ( esk2_3(X47,X48,X49) != X48
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X47,X48,X49),X49)
        | X49 = unordered_pair(X47,X48) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X47,X48,X49),X49)
        | esk2_3(X47,X48,X49) = X47
        | esk2_3(X47,X48,X49) = X48
        | X49 = unordered_pair(X47,X48) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0)) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != unordered_pair(X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk8_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk6_0,esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET914+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:39:32 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------