↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SET915+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:00:41 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.95s 4.13s
% Output   : Proof 3.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SET915+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 14:34:08 EDT 2025
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.95/4.13  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.95/4.13  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (A B : Iota), Not (in A B) → disjoint (singleton A) B)) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A B : Iota), Not (in A B) → disjoint (singleton A) B) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #17 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), Not (in a B) → disjoint (singleton a) B) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (in a a_1) → disjoint (singleton a) a_1) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (Not (in a a_1)) False) (Eq (disjoint (singleton a) a_1) True)
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (disjoint (singleton a) a_1) True) (Eq (in a a_1) True)
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #22 (by clausification #[4]): Eq (∀ (A B : Iota), Not (in A B) → disjoint (singleton A) B) False
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B : Iota), Not (in (skS.0 2 a) B) → disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) B)) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), Not (in (skS.0 2 a) B) → disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) B) False
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #25 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.95/4.13    Eq (Not (Not (in (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) → disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) (skS.0 3 a a_1))) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (in (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) → disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) False
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (in (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #28 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) False
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #29 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (in (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) False
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #30 (by superposition #[29, 20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #52 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (disjoint (singleton (skS.0 2 a)) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) True
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #53 (by superposition #[52, 28]): Eq True False
% 3.95/4.13  Clause #55 (by clausification #[53]): False
% 3.95/4.13  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------