%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET915+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.82s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 2 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ disjoint(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k0v3a3mj/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k0v3a3mj/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k0v3a3mj/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ disjoint(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET915+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 23:22:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.82/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.82/2.30 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.82/2.30 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.82/2.30 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0003_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 7.82/2.30 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.82/2.30 #
% 7.82/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.82/2.30
% 7.82/2.30 # Proof found!
% 7.82/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.82/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.82/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.82/2.30
% 7.82/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.82/2.30 # User time : 0.023 s
% 7.82/2.30 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.82/2.30 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.82/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.82/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------