↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET917+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  13   ~;   5   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  10   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(l28_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ in(A,B)
     => disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l28_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l32_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
     => set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l32_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t58_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_intersection2(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A)
      | disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t58_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t58_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( set_intersection2(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A)
        | disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t58_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( disjoint(singleton(A),B)
    | in(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l28_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( singleton(A) = set_intersection2(B,singleton(A))
    | ~ in(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l32_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(B,singleton(A)) = singleton(A)
    | ~ in(A,B) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_14]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( singleton(A) != set_intersection2(singleton(A),B)
      & ~ disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t58_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t58_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( singleton(sK0) != set_intersection2(singleton(sK0),sK1)
    & ~ disjoint(singleton(sK0),sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(singleton(sK0),sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t58_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK0) != set_intersection2(singleton(sK0),sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t58_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK0) != set_intersection2(sK1,singleton(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(sK1,singleton(sK0)) != singleton(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_31]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    disjoint(singleton(sK0),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET917+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.44  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:28:44 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.20/0.45  % Process 3571878 was started by sandbox2 on n015,
% 0.20/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:28:44 2026
% 0.20/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.20/0.47  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.20/0.47  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.20/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.20/0.47  % Given clauses 13.
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------