↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : SET920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:44:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 38.04s 5.28s
% Output   : Proof 38.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  38   ~;  35   |;  27   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   4 sgn  36   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_intersection2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f4_nnf,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ( in(D,B)
              & in(D,A)
              & ~ in(D,C) )
            | ( ( ~ in(D,B)
                | ~ in(D,A) )
              & in(D,C) ) )
        | C = set_intersection2(A,B) )
      & ( ! [D] :
            ( ( ~ in(D,B)
              | ~ in(D,A)
              | in(D,C) )
            & ( ( in(D,B)
                & in(D,A) )
              | ~ in(D,C) ) )
        | C != set_intersection2(A,B) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

fof(f4_sk,plain,
    ! [C,A,B,D] :
      ( ( ( in(sk1(A,B,C),B)
          & in(sk1(A,B,C),A)
          & ~ in(sk1(A,B,C),C) )
        | ( ( ~ in(sk1(A,B,C),B)
            | ~ in(sk1(A,B,C),A) )
          & in(sk1(A,B,C),C) )
        | C = set_intersection2(A,B) )
      & ( ( ( ~ in(D,B)
            | ~ in(D,A)
            | in(D,C) )
          & ( ( in(D,B)
              & in(D,A) )
            | ~ in(D,C) ) )
        | C != set_intersection2(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk1])],[f4_nnf]) ).

cnf(c12,plain,
    ( in(X3,X0)
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | X2 != set_intersection2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f4_sk]) ).

fof(f8,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( set_intersection2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B)
     => in(A,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t63_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f8_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( set_intersection2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B)
       => in(A,C) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f8]) ).

fof(f8_nnf,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ in(A,C)
      & set_intersection2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8_neg]) ).

fof(f8_sk,plain,
    ( ~ in(sk4,sk6)
    & set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sk4,sk5),sk6) = unordered_pair(sk4,sk5) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk4,sk5,sk6])],[f8_nnf]) ).

cnf(c24,plain,
    set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sk4,sk5),sk6) = unordered_pair(sk4,sk5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f8_sk]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f2_nnf,plain,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

fof(f2_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f2_nnf]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f2_sk]) ).

cnf(p28,plain,
    unordered_pair(sk4,sk5) = set_intersection2(sk6,unordered_pair(sk4,sk5)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c24,c2]) ).

cnf(p74,plain,
    ( in(X0,sk6)
    | ~ in(X0,unordered_pair(sk4,sk5)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c12,p28]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(f3_nnf,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ( ( D = B
                | D = A )
              & ~ in(D,C) )
            | ( D != B
              & D != A
              & in(D,C) ) )
        | C = unordered_pair(A,B) )
      & ( ! [D] :
            ( ( ( D != B
                & D != A )
              | in(D,C) )
            & ( D = B
              | D = A
              | ~ in(D,C) ) )
        | C != unordered_pair(A,B) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

fof(f3_sk,plain,
    ! [C,A,B,D] :
      ( ( ( ( sk0(A,B,C) = B
            | sk0(A,B,C) = A )
          & ~ in(sk0(A,B,C),C) )
        | ( sk0(A,B,C) != B
          & sk0(A,B,C) != A
          & in(sk0(A,B,C),C) )
        | C = unordered_pair(A,B) )
      & ( ( ( ( D != B
              & D != A )
            | in(D,C) )
          & ( D = B
            | D = A
            | ~ in(D,C) ) )
        | C != unordered_pair(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0])],[f3_nnf]) ).

cnf(c4,plain,
    ( X3 != X0
    | in(X3,X2)
    | X2 != unordered_pair(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f3_sk]) ).

cnf(p33,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | in(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c4]) ).

cnf(p36,plain,
    in(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[p33]) ).

cnf(p78,plain,
    in(sk4,sk6),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p74,p36]) ).

cnf(c25,plain,
    ~ in(sk4,sk6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f8_sk]) ).

cnf(p81,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p78,c25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 38.04/5.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 38.04/5.28  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------