↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  11   ~;   7   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   4 sgn  14   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_intersection2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t63_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( set_intersection2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B)
     => in(A,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t63_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t63_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( set_intersection2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B)
       => in(A,C) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t63_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( D != A
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( in(D,B)
    | ~ in(D,C)
    | set_intersection2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ in(A,C)
      & set_intersection2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t63_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t63_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0,sK2)
    & set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2)],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t63_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t63_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ( A != B
    | in(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_14]) ).

cnf(c_208,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(A,sK2)
    | ~ in(A,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_131,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_208,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_206,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_42]) ).

cnf(c_207,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_131]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.61  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.61  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.61  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.61  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.61  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.62  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.62  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.62  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:25:50 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.62  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.62  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/0.62  % Process 849343 was started by sandbox2 on n019,
% 0.13/0.62  % Sat Sep 26 08:25:50 2026
% 0.13/0.62  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.63  
% 0.13/0.63  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.18/0.68  
% 0.18/0.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.68  
% 0.18/0.68  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.18/0.68  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.18/0.68  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.18/0.68  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 0.18/0.68  % Given clauses 31.
% 0.18/0.68  
% 0.18/0.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------