↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET923+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:23:00 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.46s 0.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SET923+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 17:55:38 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.45/0.52  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.72  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.46/0.72  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.72  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.46/0.72  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.46/0.72  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.46/0.72  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.46/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.72  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.73  % File     : SET923+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.46/0.73  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.46/0.73  % Problem  : ~ ( difference(A,sgtn(B)) = empty & A != empty & A != sgtn(B) )
% 0.46/0.73  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.46/0.73  % English  :
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.46/0.73  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.46/0.73  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.46/0.73  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t66_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.46/0.73  % Rating   : 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.5.0, 0.09 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.04 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.05 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0
% 0.46/0.73  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   4 unt;   0 def)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Number of atoms       :   12 (   6 equ)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   4   ~;   1   |;   2   &)
% 0.46/0.73  %                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.46/0.73  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   8   !;   2   ?)
% 0.46/0.73  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.46/0.73  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.46/0.73  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.73  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.73      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  fof(l4_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.46/0.73      ! [A,B] :
% 0.46/0.73        ( subset(A,singleton(B))
% 0.46/0.73      <=> ( A = empty_set
% 0.46/0.73          | A = singleton(B) ) ) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.73      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.73      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.46/0.73      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
% 0.46/0.73      ! [A,B] :
% 0.46/0.73        ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set
% 0.46/0.73      <=> subset(A,B) ) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  fof(t66_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.46/0.73      ! [A,B] :
% 0.46/0.73        ~ ( set_difference(A,singleton(B)) = empty_set
% 0.46/0.73          & A != empty_set
% 0.46/0.73          & A != singleton(B) ) ).
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.73  % Proof found
% 0.46/0.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.73  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.73  %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.46/0.73  %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:11)
% 0.46/0.73  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.46/0.73  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.46/0.73  %SharedTerms:13
% 0.46/0.73  %goalClause: 13 14 15
% 0.46/0.73  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.46/0.73  [10]P1(a1)
% 0.46/0.73  [11]P1(a2)
% 0.46/0.73  [14]~E(a1,a3)
% 0.46/0.73  [16]~P1(a4)
% 0.46/0.73  [15]~E(f6(a5),a3)
% 0.46/0.73  [13]E(f7(a3,f6(a5)),a1)
% 0.46/0.73  [12]P2(x121,x121)
% 0.46/0.73  [17]~E(x171,a1)+P2(x171,f6(x172))
% 0.46/0.73  [18]P2(x181,f6(x182))+~E(x181,f6(x182))
% 0.46/0.73  [19]~P2(x191,x192)+E(f7(x191,x192),a1)
% 0.46/0.73  [20]P2(x201,x202)+~E(f7(x201,x202),a1)
% 0.46/0.73  [21]E(x211,a1)+E(x211,f6(x212))+~P2(x211,f6(x212))
% 0.46/0.73  %EqnAxiom
% 0.46/0.73  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.46/0.73  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.46/0.73  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.46/0.73  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41),f6(x42))
% 0.46/0.73  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f7(x51,x53),f7(x52,x53))
% 0.46/0.73  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x63,x61),f7(x63,x62))
% 0.46/0.73  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.46/0.73  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.46/0.73  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.46/0.73  
% 0.46/0.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.73  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.46/0.73     (P2(a3,f6(a5))),
% 0.46/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,17,20])).
% 0.46/0.73  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.46/0.73     (E(a1,f7(a3,f6(a5)))),
% 0.46/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,17,20,2])).
% 0.46/0.73  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.46/0.73     (~E(a3,f7(a3,f6(a5)))),
% 0.46/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,28,3,2])).
% 0.46/0.73  cnf(55,plain,
% 0.46/0.73     ($false),
% 0.46/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,26,28,51,3,21,2]),
% 0.46/0.73     ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.73  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.73  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------