↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET924+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  15   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t67_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t67_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l34_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l34_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) = singleton(X1)
      <=> ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t67_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l34_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0) != singleton(esk3_0)
      | in(esk3_0,esk4_0) )
    & ( set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0) = singleton(esk3_0)
      | ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] :
      ( ( set_difference(singleton(X17),X18) != singleton(X17)
        | ~ in(X17,X18) )
      & ( in(X17,X18)
        | set_difference(singleton(X17),X18) = singleton(X17) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0) != singleton(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) != singleton(X1)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0) = singleton(esk3_0)
    | ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0) != singleton(esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) = singleton(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET924+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:40:08 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------