↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET925+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:45:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   4 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  29   ~;  30   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  12   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) = empty_set
    <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t68_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) = empty_set
      <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) = empty_set
    <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l36_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) = empty_set
    <~> in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ in(X0,X1)
        | empty_set != set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) )
      & ( in(X0,X1)
        | set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
      | empty_set != set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3) )
    & ( in(sK2,sK3)
      | empty_set = set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK2),skolemize(X1,sK3)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) = empty_set
        | ~ in(X0,X1) )
      & ( in(X0,X1)
        | empty_set != set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( in(sK2,sK3)
    | empty_set = set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
    | empty_set != set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set != set_difference(singleton(X0),X1)
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | empty_set = set_difference(singleton(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f24,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> empty_set = set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( empty_set != set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3)
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( empty_set = set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f28,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> in(sK2,sK3) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( in(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f28,f24]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f28,f24]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( empty_set = set_difference(singleton(sK2),sK3)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f22,f30]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f34,f25]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( empty_set != empty_set
    | in(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f21,f26]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( in(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f38,f29]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f39]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f32]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f36]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s3]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s5]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s6,s5]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET925+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:06:21 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.43  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171890)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=452793728:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3171890-3171898"...
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171896)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171898)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3171890)Success in time 0.025 s
% 0.19/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------