↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET926+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:23:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07  % Problem    : SET926+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.07  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 14:05:08 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.26  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.44  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.47  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.11/0.47  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.47  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.11/0.47  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.11/0.47  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.47  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.47  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  % File     : SET926+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.47  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.11/0.47  % Problem  : difference(sgtn(A),B) = empty | difference(sgtn(A),B) = sgtn(A)
% 0.11/0.47  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.11/0.47  % English  :
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.11/0.47  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.11/0.47  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.11/0.47  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t69_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.11/0.47  % Rating   : 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.11/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :   11 (   4 equ)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
% 0.11/0.47  %                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.11/0.47  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   8   !;   2   ?)
% 0.11/0.47  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.11/0.47  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.11/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.11/0.47      ! [A,B] :
% 0.11/0.47        ( in(A,B)
% 0.11/0.47       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.11/0.47      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  fof(l34_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.11/0.47      ! [A,B] :
% 0.11/0.47        ( set_difference(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A)
% 0.11/0.47      <=> ~ in(A,B) ) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  fof(l36_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.11/0.47      ! [A,B] :
% 0.11/0.47        ( set_difference(singleton(A),B) = empty_set
% 0.11/0.47      <=> in(A,B) ) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.11/0.47      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.11/0.47      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  fof(t69_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.11/0.47      ! [A,B] :
% 0.11/0.47        ( set_difference(singleton(A),B) = empty_set
% 0.11/0.47        | set_difference(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A) ) ).
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  % Proof found
% 0.11/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.47  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.47  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.11/0.47  %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 0.11/0.47  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.11/0.47  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.11/0.47  %SharedTerms:12
% 0.11/0.47  %goalClause: 13 14
% 0.11/0.47  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.11/0.47  [10]P1(a1)
% 0.11/0.47  [11]P1(a2)
% 0.11/0.47  [12]~P1(a3)
% 0.11/0.47  [13]~E(f7(f5(a4),a6),a1)
% 0.11/0.47  [14]~E(f7(f5(a4),a6),f5(a4))
% 0.11/0.47  [17]~P2(x172,x171)+~P2(x171,x172)
% 0.11/0.47  [15]P2(x151,x152)+E(f7(f5(x151),x152),f5(x151))
% 0.11/0.47  [16]~P2(x161,x162)+E(f7(f5(x161),x162),a1)
% 0.11/0.47  [18]P2(x181,x182)+~E(f7(f5(x181),x182),a1)
% 0.11/0.47  [19]~P2(x191,x192)+~E(f7(f5(x191),x192),f5(x191))
% 0.11/0.47  %EqnAxiom
% 0.11/0.47  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.11/0.47  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.11/0.47  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.11/0.47  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.11/0.47  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f7(x51,x53),f7(x52,x53))
% 0.11/0.47  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x63,x61),f7(x63,x62))
% 0.11/0.47  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.11/0.47  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.11/0.47  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.11/0.47  
% 0.11/0.47  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.11/0.48     ($false),
% 0.11/0.48     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,14,16,15]),
% 0.11/0.48     ['proof']).
% 0.11/0.48  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.11/0.48  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------