↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET929+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  24   ~;  28   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn  11   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set
    <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(t38_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    <=> ( in(B,C)
        & in(A,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t73_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = empty_set
    <=> ( in(B,C)
        & in(A,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t73_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t73_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = empty_set
      <=> ( in(B,C)
          & in(A,C) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t73_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) != empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) = empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( in(A,C)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( in(B,C)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,C)
    | ~ in(A,C)
    | subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_8,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ~ in(B,C)
        | ~ in(A,C)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != empty_set )
      & ( ( in(B,C)
          & in(A,C) )
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t73_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t73_zfmisc_1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(sK1,sK2)
      | ~ in(sK0,sK2)
      | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != empty_set )
    & ( ( in(sK1,sK2)
        & in(sK0,sK2) )
      | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2)],[nnf_8]) ).

fof(sk_t73_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(sK1,sK2)
      | ~ in(sK0,sK2)
      | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != empty_set )
    & ( in(sK1,sK2)
      | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set )
    & ( in(sK0,sK2)
      | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_t73_zfmisc_1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK0,sK2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t73_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK1,sK2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t73_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ in(sK0,sK2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t73_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2)
    | in(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2)
    | in(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( in(sK0,sK2)
    | in(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    in(sK0,sK2),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,sK2)
    | subset(unordered_pair(A,sK1),sK2)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( in(sK1,sK2)
    | in(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    in(sK1,sK2),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0,sK2)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) = empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_92]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET929+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:26:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.36  % Process 1238191 was started by sandbox2 on n004,
% 0.10/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:26:21 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.36  
% 0.10/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/0.37  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.14/0.37  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.14/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 28.000.
% 0.14/0.37  % Given clauses 38.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------