↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET929+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:49:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.22s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (  41 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  142 (  59   ~;  63   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (   0 sgn  87   !;   9   ?;  55   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
    <=> ( in(X1,X2)
        & in(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f9,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = empty_set
    <=> ( in(X1,X2)
        & in(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t73_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = empty_set
      <=> ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f9]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = empty_set
    <~> ( in(X1,X2)
        & in(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1)
        | subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
        | ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X0,X2) ) )
      & ( ~ in(X1,X2)
        | ~ in(X0,X2)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
        | ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X0,X2) ) )
      & ( ~ in(X1,X2)
        | ~ in(X0,X2)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = empty_set
        | ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X0,X2) ) )
      & ( empty_set != set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
        | ~ in(X1,X2)
        | ~ in(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = empty_set
        | ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X0,X2) ) )
      & ( empty_set != set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
        | ~ in(X1,X2)
        | ~ in(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ( empty_set = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)
      | ( in(sK3,sK4)
        & in(sK2,sK4) ) )
    & ( empty_set != set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)
      | ~ in(sK3,sK4)
      | ~ in(sK2,sK4) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK2),skolemize(X1,sK3),skolemize(X2,sK4)],[f20]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | empty_set = set_difference(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | in(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X2)
      | ~ in(X0,X2)
      | subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( empty_set = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)
    | in(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( empty_set = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)
    | in(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( empty_set != set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)
    | ~ in(sK3,sK4)
    | ~ in(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set )
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ( set_difference(X0,X1) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X2,X0),X1)
      | ~ in(X2,X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X2)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK3,sK4)
    | ~ in(sK2,sK4)
    | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK2,sK4)
    | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK3,sK4)
    | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_difference(X0,X1) != empty_set )
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ( set_difference(X0,X1) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set )
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
      | in(X0,X2) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X2)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ( ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = empty_set )
    | in(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ( in(sK2,sK4)
    | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ( ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = empty_set )
    | in(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ( in(sK3,sK4)
    | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_241,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( set_difference(X2,X3) = empty_set )
      | ~ in(X1,X4)
      | ~ in(X0,X4)
      | ( X3 != X4 )
      | ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_242,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X2),X1) = empty_set )
      | ~ in(X2,X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_241]) ).

tcf(c_252,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( in(X3,X4)
      | ( X1 != X4 )
      | ( set_difference(X0,X1) != empty_set )
      | ( unordered_pair(X2,X3) != X0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_77]) ).

tcf(c_253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
      | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_252]) ).

tcf(c_261,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( in(X2,X4)
      | ( X1 != X4 )
      | ( set_difference(X0,X1) != empty_set )
      | ( unordered_pair(X2,X3) != X0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_262,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X2)
      | ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_261]) ).

tcf(c_303,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK3,sK4)
    | ~ in(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_242]) ).

tcf(c_305,plain,
    in(sK3,sK4),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_253]) ).

tcf(c_308,plain,
    in(sK2,sK4),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_262]) ).

tcf(c_310,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_308,c_305,c_303]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET929+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:26:20 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.22/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.22/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.22/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.22/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.22/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s % 
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.22/1.29  
% 1.22/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------