↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:23:02 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem    : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:02:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.84  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.71/0.84  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.84  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.71/0.84  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.71/0.84  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.71/0.84  
% 0.71/0.84  % Result      :Theorem 0.220000s
% 0.71/0.84  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.220000s
% 0.71/0.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.85  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.85  % File     : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.71/0.85  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.71/0.85  % Problem  : Basic properties of sets, theorem 74
% 0.71/0.85  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.71/0.85  % English  : ~ ( difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != empty_set
% 0.71/0.85  %              & difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != singleton(A)
% 0.71/0.85  %              & difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != singleton(B)
% 0.71/0.85  %              & difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != unordered_pair(A,B) )
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.71/0.85  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.71/0.85  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.71/0.85  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t74_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.71/0.85  % Rating   : 0.17 v8.2.0, 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.5.0, 0.19 v7.4.0, 0.10 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.10 v7.1.0, 0.13 v7.0.0, 0.10 v6.4.0, 0.15 v6.3.0, 0.12 v6.2.0, 0.16 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.4.0, 0.18 v5.3.0, 0.26 v5.2.0, 0.10 v5.0.0, 0.17 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.4.0, 0.16 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.71/0.85  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   4 unt;   0 def)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Number of atoms       :   20 (   9 equ)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Number of connectives :   21 (  10   ~;   1   |;   6   &)
% 0.71/0.85  %                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.71/0.85  %            Number of variables   :   18 (  16   !;   2   ?)
% 0.71/0.85  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.71/0.85  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.71/0.85  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.85  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ! [A,B] :
% 0.71/0.85        ( in(A,B)
% 0.71/0.85       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(l39_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.85        ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = singleton(A)
% 0.71/0.85      <=> ( ~ in(A,C)
% 0.71/0.85          & ( in(B,C)
% 0.71/0.85            | A = B ) ) ) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(t72_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.85        ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = unordered_pair(A,B)
% 0.71/0.85      <=> ( ~ in(A,C)
% 0.71/0.85          & ~ in(B,C) ) ) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(t73_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.71/0.85      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.85        ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = empty_set
% 0.71/0.85      <=> ( in(A,C)
% 0.71/0.85          & in(B,C) ) ) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  fof(t74_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.71/0.85      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.71/0.85        ~ ( set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != empty_set
% 0.71/0.85          & set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != singleton(A)
% 0.71/0.85          & set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != singleton(B)
% 0.71/0.85          & set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C) != unordered_pair(A,B) ) ).
% 0.71/0.85  
% 0.71/0.85  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.85  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.85  % Proof found
% 0.71/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.85  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.71/0.85  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.71/0.85  %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:34)
% 0.71/0.85  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.71/0.85  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.78/0.85  %SharedTerms:17
% 0.78/0.85  %goalClause: 16 17 18 19
% 0.78/0.85  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.78/0.85  [12]P1(a1)
% 0.78/0.85  [13]P1(a2)
% 0.78/0.85  [15]~P1(a4)
% 0.78/0.85  [16]~E(f8(f3(a5,a6),a7),a1)
% 0.78/0.85  [17]~E(f8(f3(a5,a6),a7),f9(a5))
% 0.78/0.85  [18]~E(f8(f3(a5,a6),a7),f9(a6))
% 0.78/0.85  [19]~E(f8(f3(a5,a6),a7),f3(a5,a6))
% 0.78/0.85  [14]E(f3(x141,x142),f3(x142,x141))
% 0.78/0.85  [20]~P2(x202,x201)+~P2(x201,x202)
% 0.78/0.85  [22]P2(x221,x222)+~E(f8(f3(x223,x221),x222),a1)
% 0.78/0.85  [23]P2(x231,x232)+~E(f8(f3(x231,x233),x232),a1)
% 0.78/0.85  [28]~P2(x281,x283)+~E(f8(f3(x281,x282),x283),f9(x281))
% 0.78/0.85  [29]~P2(x292,x293)+~E(f8(f3(x291,x292),x293),f3(x291,x292))
% 0.78/0.85  [30]~P2(x301,x303)+~E(f8(f3(x301,x302),x303),f3(x301,x302))
% 0.78/0.85  [21]P2(x211,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+E(f8(f3(x211,x212),x213),f9(x211))
% 0.78/0.85  [24]P2(x241,x243)+~P2(x242,x243)+E(f8(f3(x241,x242),x243),f9(x241))
% 0.78/0.85  [25]P2(x252,x253)+P2(x251,x253)+E(f8(f3(x251,x252),x253),f3(x251,x252))
% 0.78/0.85  [26]~P2(x262,x263)+~P2(x261,x263)+E(f8(f3(x261,x262),x263),a1)
% 0.78/0.85  [27]E(x271,x272)+P2(x271,x273)+~E(f8(f3(x272,x271),x273),f9(x272))
% 0.78/0.85  %EqnAxiom
% 0.78/0.85  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.78/0.85  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.78/0.85  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.78/0.85  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43),f3(x42,x43))
% 0.78/0.85  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51),f3(x53,x52))
% 0.78/0.85  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f8(x61,x63),f8(x62,x63))
% 0.78/0.85  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f8(x73,x71),f8(x73,x72))
% 0.78/0.85  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f9(x81),f9(x82))
% 0.78/0.85  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.78/0.85  [10]P2(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x101,x103)
% 0.78/0.85  [11]P2(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x111)
% 0.78/0.85  
% 0.78/0.85  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.78/0.86  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.78/0.86     (~P2(a6,a7)+~P2(a5,a7)),
% 0.78/0.86     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,19,14,3,26])).
% 0.78/0.86  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.78/0.86     (P2(a5,a7)),
% 0.78/0.86     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,17,25,24])).
% 0.78/0.86  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.78/0.86     (~P2(a6,a7)),
% 0.78/0.86     inference(scs_inference,[],[43,34])).
% 0.78/0.86  cnf(98,plain,
% 0.78/0.86     (E(f9(a6),f8(f3(a6,a5),a7))),
% 0.78/0.86     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,43,2,24])).
% 0.78/0.86  cnf(99,plain,
% 0.78/0.86     (E(f8(f3(a6,a5),a7),f9(a6))),
% 0.78/0.86     inference(scs_inference,[],[98,2])).
% 0.78/0.86  cnf(108,plain,
% 0.78/0.86     ($false),
% 0.78/0.86     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,99,14,3,6]),
% 0.78/0.86     ['proof']).
% 0.78/0.86  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.78/0.86  % Total time :0.220000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------