↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET930+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  116 (  54   ~;  34   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   2 sgn  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l39_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        & ( in(X2,X3)
          | X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l39_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t72_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        & ~ in(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

fof(t74_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != empty_set
        & set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != singleton(X1)
        & set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != singleton(X2)
        & set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != unordered_pair(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t73_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = empty_set
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t73_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X1)
    <=> ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        & ( in(X2,X3)
          | X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l39_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X26,X27,X28] :
      ( ( ~ in(X26,X28)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X26,X27),X28) != singleton(X26) )
      & ( in(X27,X28)
        | X26 = X27
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X26,X27),X28) != singleton(X26) )
      & ( ~ in(X27,X28)
        | in(X26,X28)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X26,X27),X28) = singleton(X26) )
      & ( X26 != X27
        | in(X26,X28)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X26,X27),X28) = singleton(X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        & ~ in(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t72_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_r2_hidden]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X1)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( ~ in(X31,X33)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X31,X32),X33) != unordered_pair(X31,X32) )
      & ( ~ in(X32,X33)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X31,X32),X33) != unordered_pair(X31,X32) )
      & ( in(X31,X33)
        | in(X32,X33)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X31,X32),X33) = unordered_pair(X31,X32) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ~ in(X22,X23)
      | ~ in(X23,X22) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = singleton(X1)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = unordered_pair(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != empty_set
          & set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != singleton(X1)
          & set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != singleton(X2)
          & set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) != unordered_pair(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t74_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != empty_set
    & set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != singleton(esk3_0)
    & set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != singleton(esk4_0)
    & set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36] :
      ( ( in(X34,X36)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X34,X35),X36) != empty_set )
      & ( in(X35,X36)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X34,X35),X36) != empty_set )
      & ( ~ in(X34,X36)
        | ~ in(X35,X36)
        | set_difference(unordered_pair(X34,X35),X36) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t73_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = empty_set
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1)
    | unordered_pair(X2,X2) = singleton(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] : unordered_pair(X24,X25) = unordered_pair(X25,X24),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != singleton(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(X3,X1),X2) = singleton(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != singleton(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = singleton(X2)
    | in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_14]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_29]),c_0_35])]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET930+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:40:15 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------