%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:05:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),empty_set),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),singleton(sK2)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),singleton(sK3)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ in(sK3,sK4)
| sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),singleton(sK2))
| in(sK2,sK4) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l39_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),unordered_pair(sK2,sK3))
| in(sK2,sK4)
| in(sK3,sK4) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ in(sK2,sK4)
| sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4),singleton(sK3))
| in(sK3,sK4) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l39_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
sPE(sK4,sK4),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4))
| ~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4),empty_set)
| sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),empty_set) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ in(sK3,sK4)
| ~ in(sK2,sK4)
| sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4),empty_set) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t73_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),unordered_pair(sK3,sK2))
| ~ sPE(sK4,sK4)
| sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
sPE(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),unordered_pair(sK3,sK2)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4))
| ~ sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK3,sK2),sK4),singleton(sK3))
| sPE(set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),singleton(sK3)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 21:36:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 % symbols: 13
% 0.12/0.35 % clauses: 27
% 0.12/0.35 % start clauses: 4
% 0.12/0.35 % iterative deepening steps: 76
% 0.12/0.35 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.12/0.35 % literal attempts: 15406
% 0.12/0.35 % depth failures: 10764
% 0.12/0.35 % regularity failures: 1096
% 0.12/0.35 % tautology failures: 657
% 0.12/0.35 % reductions: 670
% 0.12/0.35 % extensions: 14535
% 0.12/0.35 % SAT variables: 3811
% 0.12/0.35 % SAT clauses: 4892
% 0.12/0.35 % WalkSAT solutions: 4889
% 0.12/0.35 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------