↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET932+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:21:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.79s 1.00s
% Output   : Refutation 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SET932+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 05:10:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Mon Jul 11 05:10:52 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 27575.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.20/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.20/0.39     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.39     distinct function count: 3
% 0.20/0.39     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.79/1.00  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.79/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 4 [ 1 0 114 ] (0.00 seconds, 1146 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 5 [ 1 0 294 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 6 [ 2 0 327 ] (0.00 seconds, 662 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 7 [ 2 0 265 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.60 sec ----> 1946 [binary,1945.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.79/1.00  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.79/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  2 [] {+} A!=powerset(B)| -in(C,A)|subset(C,B).
% 0.79/1.00  3 [] {+} A!=powerset(B)|in(C,A)| -subset(C,B).
% 0.79/1.00  6 [] {+} subset(A,B)| -in($f2(A,B),B).
% 0.79/1.00  8 [] {+} -subset(A,B)| -subset(B,C)|subset(A,C).
% 0.79/1.00  9 [] {+} -subset(powerset($c4),powerset($c3)).
% 0.79/1.00  12 [] {+} subset(A,B)|in($f2(A,B),A).
% 0.79/1.00  15 [] {+} subset($c4,$c3).
% 0.79/1.00  16 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.79/1.00  40 [hyper,12,9] {+} in($f2(powerset($c4),powerset($c3)),powerset($c4)).
% 0.79/1.00  975 [hyper,40,2,16] {+} subset($f2(powerset($c4),powerset($c3)),$c4).
% 0.79/1.00  1821 [hyper,975,8,15] {-} subset($f2(powerset($c4),powerset($c3)),$c3).
% 0.79/1.00  1891 [hyper,1821,3,16] {-} in($f2(powerset($c4),powerset($c3)),powerset($c3)).
% 0.79/1.00  1945 [hyper,1891,6] {-} subset(powerset($c4),powerset($c3)).
% 0.79/1.00  1946 [binary,1945.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.79/1.00  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  ============ end of search ============
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  true clauses given           5      (14.3%)
% 0.79/1.00  false clauses given         30
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.79/1.00     8  0         1
% 0.79/1.00     9  0         2
% 0.79/1.00    10  0         3
% 0.79/1.00    11  0         5
% 0.79/1.00    12  2         3
% 0.79/1.00    13  2         8
% 0.79/1.00    14  9         8
% 0.79/1.00    15  8         9
% 0.79/1.00    16  6         8
% 0.79/1.00    17  13        21
% 0.79/1.00    18  20        30
% 0.79/1.00    19  16        28
% 0.79/1.00    20  18        33
% 0.79/1.00    21  11        13
% 0.79/1.00    22  17        15
% 0.79/1.00    23  21        21
% 0.79/1.00    24  27        30
% 0.79/1.00    25  9         10
% 0.79/1.00    26  10        7
% 0.79/1.00    27  5         7
% 0.79/1.00    28  21        18
% 0.79/1.00    29  16        13
% 0.79/1.00    30  14        7
% 0.79/1.00    31  9         10
% 0.79/1.00    32  27        19
% 0.79/1.00    33  43        41
% 0.79/1.00    34  45        34
% 0.79/1.00    35  44        35
% 0.79/1.00    36  21        19
% 0.79/1.00    37  46        38
% 0.79/1.00    38  37        28
% 0.79/1.00    39  65        38
% 0.79/1.00    40  26        20
% 0.79/1.00    41  20        16
% 0.79/1.00    42  36        26
% 0.79/1.00    43  27        25
% 0.79/1.00    44  60        34
% 0.79/1.00    45  13        9
% 0.79/1.00    46  4         8
% 0.79/1.00    47  26        18
% 0.79/1.00    48  53        18
% 0.79/1.00    49  25        13
% 0.79/1.00    50  22        10
% 0.79/1.00    51  4         7
% 0.79/1.00    52  0         4
% 0.79/1.00    53  1         3
% 0.79/1.00    54  0         8
% 0.79/1.00    55  8         11
% 0.79/1.00    56  0         5
% 0.79/1.00    57  10        2
% 0.79/1.00    58  7         0
% 0.79/1.00    59  36        11
% 0.79/1.00    60  1         8
% 0.79/1.00  tot:  961       818      (46.0% true)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Model 7 [ 2 0 265 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.79/1.00  
% 0.79/1.00  Process 27575 finished Mon Jul 11 05:10:53 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------