↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET935+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:09:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.31s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  43   ~;  56   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   3 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            | in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t82_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_union2(powerset(X1),powerset(X2)) = powerset(set_union2(X1,X2))
     => inclusion_comparable(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t82_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = powerset(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> subset(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(d9_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        | subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57,X58] :
      ( ( ~ in(X54,X53)
        | in(X54,X51)
        | in(X54,X52)
        | X53 != set_union2(X51,X52) )
      & ( ~ in(X55,X51)
        | in(X55,X53)
        | X53 != set_union2(X51,X52) )
      & ( ~ in(X55,X52)
        | in(X55,X53)
        | X53 != set_union2(X51,X52) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X56)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X58)
        | X58 = set_union2(X56,X57) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X57)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X58)
        | X58 = set_union2(X56,X57) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X58)
        | in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X56)
        | in(esk2_3(X56,X57,X58),X57)
        | X58 = set_union2(X56,X57) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( set_union2(powerset(X1),powerset(X2)) = powerset(set_union2(X1,X2))
       => inclusion_comparable(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t82_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_union2(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_union2(powerset(esk5_0),powerset(esk6_0)) = powerset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0))
    & ~ inclusion_comparable(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49] :
      ( ( ~ in(X46,X45)
        | subset(X46,X44)
        | X45 != powerset(X44) )
      & ( ~ subset(X47,X44)
        | in(X47,X45)
        | X45 != powerset(X44) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X48,X49),X49)
        | ~ subset(esk1_2(X48,X49),X48)
        | X49 = powerset(X48) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X48,X49),X49)
        | subset(esk1_2(X48,X49),X48)
        | X49 = powerset(X48) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,set_union2(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(powerset(esk5_0),powerset(esk6_0)) = powerset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | X3 != powerset(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,powerset(esk5_0))
    | in(X1,powerset(esk6_0))
    | ~ in(X1,powerset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X69] : subset(X69,X69),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != powerset(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,powerset(esk6_0))
    | in(X1,powerset(esk5_0))
    | ~ subset(X1,set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0))
    | in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk6_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] : subset(X73,set_union2(X73,X74)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] : set_union2(X40,X41) = set_union2(X41,X40),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X42,X43] :
      ( ( subset(X42,X43)
        | X42 != X43 )
      & ( subset(X43,X42)
        | X42 != X43 )
      & ( ~ subset(X42,X43)
        | ~ subset(X43,X42)
        | X42 = X43 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk6_0)
    | in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk6_0)
    | subset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X60,X61] :
      ( ( ~ inclusion_comparable(X60,X61)
        | subset(X60,X61)
        | subset(X61,X60) )
      & ( ~ subset(X60,X61)
        | inclusion_comparable(X60,X61) )
      & ( ~ subset(X61,X60)
        | inclusion_comparable(X60,X61) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_xboole_0])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk6_0
    | subset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk6_0
    | set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk5_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_34]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk6_0,esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET935+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:40:06 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.31/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.31/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.31/1.73  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------