↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET935+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.49s 2.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  19 unt;   7 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   69 (  14 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != powerset(X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) = set_union2(powerset(esk5_0),powerset(esk6_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X3 != powerset(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_17,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_28) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4dk1d9ar/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != powerset(X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) = set_union2(powerset(esk5_0),powerset(esk6_0)),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( in(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X3 != powerset(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,powerset(esk5_0))
    | in(X1,powerset(esk6_0))
    | ~ in(X1,powerset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    in(X1,powerset(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk6_0))
    | in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0))
    | subset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    inclusion_comparable(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk6_0
    | in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57])]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    i_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    in(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    inclusion_comparable(set_union2(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    subset(set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    inclusion_comparable(set_union2(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_64]),c_0_52])]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_66]),c_0_60]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SET935+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 23:27:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.49/2.35  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.49/2.35  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.49/2.35  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.49/2.35  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S006A
% 4.49/2.35  # and selection function SelectLargestNegLit.
% 4.49/2.35  #
% 4.49/2.35  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 4.49/2.35  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.49/2.35  
% 4.49/2.35  # Proof found!
% 4.49/2.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.49/2.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.49/2.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.49/2.35  
% 4.49/2.35  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.49/2.35  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 4.49/2.35  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 4.49/2.35  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 4.49/2.35  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 4.49/2.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------