%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SET938+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:03:59 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.55s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET938+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 17:23:16 EDT 2022 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I % 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMaxPos. % 0.18/0.36 # % 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 23 Number of unprocessed: 22 % 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.18/0.54 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.18/0.54 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.18/0.54 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.18/0.54 # 22 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.18/0.54 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.18/0.54 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.18/0.54 # Found 6 unit axioms. % 0.18/0.54 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.18/0.54 # 16 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.18/0.54 # 6 unit axiom clauses % 0.18/0.54 % 0.18/0.54 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.18/0.54 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.18/0.55 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 1 free duplicated saturations. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.18/0.55 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.18/0.55 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.55 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.55 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.18/0.55 % 0.18/0.55 # End clausification derivation % 0.18/0.55 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (empty(esk4_0))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (subset(X1,X1))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (set_union2(X1,X1)=X1)). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (set_union2(X1,X2)=set_union2(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (~subset(set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))),powerset(set_union2(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0),set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0)))))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~empty(esk5_0))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (empty(X1)|~empty(set_union2(X2,X1)))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (empty(X1)|~empty(set_union2(X1,X2)))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~subset(X3,X2)|~in(X1,X3))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (in(X1,powerset(X2))|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~in(X1,powerset(X2)))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))|~in(X1,X3))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=powerset(X2)|~subset(esk1_2(X2,X1),X2)|~in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (in(X1,X2)|in(X1,X3)|~in(X1,set_union2(X3,X2)))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X1=powerset(X2)|subset(esk1_2(X2,X1),X2)|in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (X1=set_union2(X2,X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=set_union2(X2,X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2))). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=set_union2(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1))). % 0.18/0.55 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.18/0.55 # Begin printing tableau % 0.18/0.55 # Found 4 steps % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (~subset(set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))),powerset(set_union2(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0),set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~subset(set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))),powerset(set_union2(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0),set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (in(esk3_2(set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))),powerset(set_union2(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0),set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0)))),set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.18/0.55 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (~in(set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))),esk3_2(set_union2(powerset(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0)),powerset(set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0))),powerset(set_union2(set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0),set_difference(esk7_0,esk6_0)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_73, ...])). % 0.18/0.55 # End printing tableau % 0.18/0.55 # SZS output end % 0.18/0.55 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.18/0.55 # Returning from population with 4 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.18/0.55 # We now have 4 tableaux to operate on % 0.18/0.55 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.18/0.55 # Proof search is over... % 0.18/0.55 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------