↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SET940+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:00:43 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.75s 3.94s
% Output   : Proof 3.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SET940+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 13:55:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.75/3.94  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.75/3.94  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #7 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (A B : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair A B)) (set_union2 A B))) True
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #8 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A B : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair A B)) (set_union2 A B)) True
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #33 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair a B)) (set_union2 a B)) True
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (union (unordered_pair a a_1)) (set_union2 a a_1)) True
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair a a_1)) (set_union2 a a_1)
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #37 (by clausification #[7]): Eq (∀ (A B : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair A B)) (set_union2 A B)) False
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #38 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair (skS.0 2 a) B)) (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) B))) True
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #39 (by clausification #[38]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (union (unordered_pair (skS.0 2 a) B)) (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) B)) False
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.75/3.94    Eq (Not (Eq (union (unordered_pair (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))) (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1)))) True
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #41 (by clausification #[40]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.75/3.94    Eq (Eq (union (unordered_pair (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))) (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))) False
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #42 (by clausification #[41]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne (union (unordered_pair (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))) (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #43 (by forward demodulation #[42, 35]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1)) (set_union2 (skS.0 2 a) (skS.0 3 a a_1))
% 3.75/3.94  Clause #44 (by eliminate resolved literals #[43]): False
% 3.75/3.94  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------