↑ Up

SRASS---0.1.THM-Sol.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET940+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 00:21:24 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.87s
% Output   : Solution 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3130/SET940+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3130/SET940+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3130/SET940+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 3226
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:union(unordered_pair(X1,X2))=set_union2(X1,X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', l52_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(9, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:union(unordered_pair(X1,X2))=set_union2(X1,X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t93_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(10, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:union(unordered_pair(X1,X2))=set_union2(X1,X2)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9])).
% fof(20, plain,![X3]:![X4]:union(unordered_pair(X3,X4))=set_union2(X3,X4),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4])).
% cnf(21,plain,(union(unordered_pair(X1,X2))=set_union2(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20])).
% fof(34, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:~(union(unordered_pair(X1,X2))=set_union2(X1,X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(35, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:~(union(unordered_pair(X3,X4))=set_union2(X3,X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[34])).
% fof(36, negated_conjecture,~(union(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0))=set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[35])).
% cnf(37,negated_conjecture,(union(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0))!=set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36])).
% cnf(42,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[37,21,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(43,negated_conjecture,($false),42,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 1
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 0
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 0
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 0
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 0
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% # ...number of literals in the above : 9
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:     0 leaves,   0.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            0 leaves,   0.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:            0 leaves,   0.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.006 s
% # System time            : 0.005 s
% # Total time             : 0.011 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3130/SET940+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------