↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : SET954+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 08:39:39 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 2.86s 1.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   5   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (  20   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > empty > unordered_pair > ordered_pair > cartesian_product2 > #nlpp > singleton > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ordered_pair,type,
    ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(cartesian_product2,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
       => in(ordered_pair(B,A),cartesian_product2(D,C)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t107_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_44,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
    <=> ( in(A,C)
        & in(B,D) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ! [B_21,D_22,A_23,C_24] :
      ( in(B_21,D_22)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(A_23,B_21),cartesian_product2(C_24,D_22)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_94]) ).

tff(c_187,plain,
    ! [A_29,C_30,B_31,D_32] :
      ( in(A_29,C_30)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(A_29,B_31),cartesian_product2(C_30,D_32)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_191,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_187]) ).

tff(c_196,plain,
    ! [A_33,B_34,C_35,D_36] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(A_33,B_34),cartesian_product2(C_35,D_36))
      | ~ in(B_34,D_36)
      | ~ in(A_33,C_35) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_4','#skF_3'),cartesian_product2('#skF_6','#skF_5')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_205,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5')
    | ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_20]) ).

tff(c_213,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_98,c_191,c_205]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.08  % Problem  : SET954+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.09  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Tue Apr  8 21:52:51 EDT 2025
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.86/1.86  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.86/1.86  
% 2.86/1.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------