↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET956+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:09:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  30   ~;  27   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   2 sgn  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t109_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1)
           => in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4) ) )
     => subset(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t109_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(t103_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ~ ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
        & in(X4,X1)
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ~ ( in(X5,X2)
              & in(X6,X3)
              & X4 = ordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t103_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
          & ! [X5,X6] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1)
             => in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4) ) )
       => subset(X1,X4) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t109_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X61,X62] :
      ( subset(esk6_0,cartesian_product2(esk7_0,esk8_0))
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X61,X62),esk6_0)
        | in(ordered_pair(X61,X62),esk9_0) )
      & ~ subset(esk6_0,esk9_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X44,X45] : ordered_pair(X44,X45) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X44,X45),singleton(X44)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53,X54] :
      ( ( in(esk4_4(X51,X52,X53,X54),X52)
        | ~ subset(X51,cartesian_product2(X52,X53))
        | ~ in(X54,X51) )
      & ( in(esk5_4(X51,X52,X53,X54),X53)
        | ~ subset(X51,cartesian_product2(X52,X53))
        | ~ in(X54,X51) )
      & ( X54 = ordered_pair(esk4_4(X51,X52,X53,X54),esk5_4(X51,X52,X53,X54))
        | ~ subset(X51,cartesian_product2(X52,X53))
        | ~ in(X54,X51) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t103_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk9_0)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] : unordered_pair(X36,X37) = unordered_pair(X37,X36),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = ordered_pair(esk4_4(X2,X3,X4,X1),esk5_4(X2,X3,X4,X1))
    | ~ subset(X2,cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk9_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk6_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_4(X2,X3,X4,X1),esk5_4(X2,X3,X4,X1)),singleton(esk4_4(X2,X3,X4,X1)))
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,cartesian_product2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk9_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)),unordered_pair(esk4_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))) = X4
    | ~ subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40,X41,X42] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X38,X39)
        | ~ in(X40,X38)
        | in(X40,X39) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X41,X42),X41)
        | subset(X41,X42) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X41,X42),X42)
        | subset(X41,X42) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk9_0)
    | ~ subset(X2,cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk6_0,cartesian_product2(esk7_0,esk8_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk9_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk9_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,esk9_0),esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk6_0,esk9_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET956+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:39:45 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------