↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET956+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:55:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (  23   ~;  21   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   4 sgn  32   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t109_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1)
           => in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4) ) )
     => subset(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t109_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t103_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ~ ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
        & in(X4,X1)
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ~ ( in(X5,X2)
              & in(X6,X3)
              & X4 = ordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t103_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
          & ! [X5,X6] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1)
             => in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4) ) )
       => subset(X1,X4) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t109_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( subset(esk1_0,cartesian_product2(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,X12),esk1_0)
        | in(ordered_pair(X11,X12),esk4_0) )
      & ~ subset(esk1_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( in(esk6_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),X8)
        | ~ subset(X7,cartesian_product2(X8,X9))
        | ~ in(X10,X7) )
      & ( in(esk7_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),X9)
        | ~ subset(X7,cartesian_product2(X8,X9))
        | ~ in(X10,X7) )
      & ( X10 = ordered_pair(esk6_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),esk7_4(X7,X8,X9,X10))
        | ~ subset(X7,cartesian_product2(X8,X9))
        | ~ in(X10,X7) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t103_zfmisc_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk4_0)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = ordered_pair(esk6_4(X2,X3,X4,X1),esk7_4(X2,X3,X4,X1))
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,cartesian_product2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ subset(X2,cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,cartesian_product2(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk5_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk5_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,X1)
    | in(esk5_2(esk1_0,X1),esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk1_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET956+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:02:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 17
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 20
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 20
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 18
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 14
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 18
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 19
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 39
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1045
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2772 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------