%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SET957+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:25 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.72s 2.63s
% Output : Refutation 3.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 11 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 178 ( 12 ~; 0 |; 16 &; 136 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 65 ( 0 ^; 61 !; 4 ?; 65 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subset_decl,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(ordered_pair_decl,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_decl,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(24,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ! [G: $i,H: $i] :
( ( A @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
<=> ( D @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( F @ ( E @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( D @ subset ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( A = D ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t110_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ! [G: $i,H: $i] :
( ( A @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
<=> ( D @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( F @ ( E @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( D @ subset ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( A = D ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(12,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ! [G: $i,H: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
=> ( A @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( ( A @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
=> ( D @ ( H @ ( G @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) )
& ( F @ ( E @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( D @ subset ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( A = D ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(35,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
~ ( ! [E: $i,F: $i] :
~ ( ( D
= ( F @ ( E @ ordered_pair ) ) )
& ( C @ ( F @ in ) )
& ( B @ ( E @ in ) ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t103_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
~ ( ! [E: $i,F: $i] :
~ ( ( D
= ( F @ ( E @ ordered_pair ) ) )
& ( C @ ( F @ in ) )
& ( B @ ( E @ in ) ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
<=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).
thf(47,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(33,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(27,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(58,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,12,35,40,30,47,38,33,22,27]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SET957+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.50 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.50 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.50 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.50 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.50 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.50 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:30:25 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.51 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.51 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.16/1.18 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.42/1.36 % [INFO] Parsing done (183ms).
% 1.42/1.38 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.00/1.77 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.00/1.78 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.19/1.88 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 9 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.35/1.93 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 9 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.35/1.95 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.35/1.96 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.35/1.96 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.72/2.63 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.72/2.63 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.72/2.63 % Time passed: 1908ms (effective reasoning time: 1246ms)
% 3.72/2.63 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.72/2.63 % Axioms used in derivation (9): fc1_zfmisc_1, d5_tarski, t103_zfmisc_1, t2_tarski, commutativity_k2_tarski, reflexivity_r1_tarski, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 3.72/2.63 % No. of inferences in proof: 22
% 3.72/2.63 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1908 ms resp. 1246 ms w/o parsing
% 3.72/2.68 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.72/2.68 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------