↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET958+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:09:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  21   ~;  16   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   0 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t111_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ! [X3] :
            ~ ( in(X3,X1)
              & ! [X4,X5] : X3 != ordered_pair(X4,X5) )
        & ! [X3,X4] :
            ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
           => in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2) ) )
     => subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t111_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X1)
                & ! [X4,X5] : X3 != ordered_pair(X4,X5) )
          & ! [X3,X4] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
             => in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2) ) )
       => subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t111_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X47,X50,X51] :
      ( ( ~ in(X47,esk4_0)
        | X47 = ordered_pair(esk6_1(X47),esk7_1(X47)) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X50,X51),esk4_0)
        | in(ordered_pair(X50,X51),esk5_0) )
      & ~ subset(esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X38,X39] : ordered_pair(X38,X39) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X38,X39),singleton(X38)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk5_0)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X30,X31] : unordered_pair(X30,X31) = unordered_pair(X31,X30),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = ordered_pair(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk5_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk4_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1)),singleton(esk6_1(X1)))
    | ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X32,X33,X34,X35,X36] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X32,X33)
        | ~ in(X34,X32)
        | in(X34,X33) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X35,X36),X35)
        | subset(X35,X36) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X35,X36),X36)
        | subset(X35,X36) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk5_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(singleton(esk6_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,esk5_0),esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET958+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:57:36 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------