↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET958+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:42:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.73s 1.35s
% Output   : Refutation 2.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  34   ~;  25   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (  55   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f9,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ! [X2] :
            ~ ( in(X2,X0)
              & ! [X3,X4] : X2 != ordered_pair(X3,X4) )
        & ! [X2,X3] :
            ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X0)
           => in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) )
     => subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t111_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( ! [X2] :
              ~ ( in(X2,X0)
                & ! [X3,X4] : X2 != ordered_pair(X3,X4) )
          & ! [X2,X3] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X0)
             => in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) )
       => subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f9]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( ! [X2] :
              ~ ( in(X2,X0)
                & ! [X3,X4] : X2 != ordered_pair(X3,X4) )
          & ! [X5,X6] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X0)
             => in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1) ) )
       => subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X0)
          | ? [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = X2 )
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1)
          | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X0)
          | ? [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = X2 )
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X1)
          | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK0,sK1)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ~ in(X2,sK0)
        | ordered_pair(sK2(X2),sK3(X2)) = X2 )
    & ! [X5,X6] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),sK1)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),sK0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X3,sK2(X2)),skolemize(X4,sK3(X2))],[f15]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
            | ~ in(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
          & in(sK4(X0,X1),X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(X2,sK4(X0,X1))],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),sK0)
      | in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ordered_pair(sK2(X2),sK3(X2)) = X2
      | ~ in(X2,sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ~ subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK4(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ in(X0,sK0)
      | in(X0,sK1)
      | ~ in(X0,sK0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f22,f23]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ in(X0,sK0)
      | in(X0,sK1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( in(sK4(sK0,X0),sK1)
      | subset(sK0,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f31,f26]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( subset(sK0,sK1)
    | subset(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f32,f27]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET958+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:16:30 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984503)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=2882248118:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)First to succeed.
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2984503"
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2659783907:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984510)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=4101880983:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984509)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=4135531497:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984508)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1216385181:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984512)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=3647065340:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984512)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984513)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=4174847601:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984513)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)------------------------------
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Time elapsed: 0.072 s
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984514)Instructions burned: 130 (million)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.73/1.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.73/1.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)------------------------------
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)------------------------------
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984511)------------------------------
% 2.73/1.35  % (2984503)Success in time 0.301 s
% 2.73/1.35  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------