↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET960+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:30:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET960+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 07:34:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.45  SPASS derived 187 clauses, backtracked 20 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 145 clauses.
% 0.18/0.45  SPASS allocated 85299 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.18/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.45  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 9, length 67 :
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.45  6[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(u,empty_set) in(skf4(u),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  8[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,empty_set) -> .
% 0.18/0.45  9[0:Inp] || equal(empty_set,skc4) equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  10[0:Inp] || equal(empty_set,skc5) equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  12[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc5) equal(empty_set,skc4) equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)**.
% 0.18/0.45  13[0:Inp] || SkP0(u,v,w)*+ -> in(skf7(w,x,y),w)*.
% 0.18/0.45  14[0:Inp] || SkP0(u,v,w)*+ -> in(skf6(v,x,y),v)*.
% 0.18/0.45  15[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,cartesian_product2(w,x))*+ -> SkP0(u,x,w)*.
% 0.18/0.45  16[0:Inp] || equal(u,cartesian_product2(v,w))*+ SkP0(x,w,v)* -> in(x,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  19[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(u,cartesian_product2(v,w)) in(skf5(v,w,u),u)* SkP0(skf5(v,w,u),w,v)*.
% 0.18/0.45  20[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* in(w,x)* equal(y,ordered_pair(w,u))*+ -> SkP0(y,v,x)*.
% 0.18/0.45  22[1:Spt:12.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc5)**.
% 0.18/0.45  23[1:Rew:22.0,6.0] ||  -> equal(u,skc5) in(skf4(u),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  24[1:Rew:22.0,10.0] || equal(skc5,skc5) equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  27[1:Rew:22.0,8.1] || in(u,v)* equal(v,skc5) -> .
% 0.18/0.45  28[1:Obv:24.0] || equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  29[1:Rew:22.0,28.0] || equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),skc5)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  51[0:EqR:15.1] || in(u,cartesian_product2(v,w))* -> SkP0(u,w,v).
% 0.18/0.45  52[1:Res:23.1,51.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,v),skc5) SkP0(skf4(cartesian_product2(u,v)),v,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  53[1:Res:52.1,13.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,v),skc5)** in(skf7(u,w,x),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  54[1:Res:52.1,14.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,v),skc5)** in(skf6(v,w,x),v)*.
% 0.18/0.45  58[1:SpL:53.0,51.0] || in(u,skc5) -> in(skf7(v,w,x),v)* SkP0(u,y,v)*.
% 0.18/0.45  62[1:MRR:58.2,13.0] || in(u,skc5)*+ -> in(skf7(v,w,x),v)*.
% 0.18/0.45  70[0:EqR:16.0] || SkP0(u,v,w) -> in(u,cartesian_product2(w,v))*.
% 0.18/0.45  75[1:Res:53.1,62.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(skc5,u),skc5)** in(skf7(v,w,x),v)*.
% 0.18/0.45  81[2:Spt:75.1] ||  -> in(skf7(u,v,w),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  83[2:Res:81.0,27.0] || equal(u,skc5)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  85[2:Obv:83.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.45  86[2:Spt:85.0,75.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(skc5,u),skc5)**.
% 0.18/0.45  92[2:SpL:86.0,51.0] || in(u,skc5) -> SkP0(u,v,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45  93[2:SpL:86.0,16.0] || equal(u,skc5) SkP0(v,w,skc5)* -> in(v,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  94[2:MRR:93.2,27.0] || equal(u,skc5)* SkP0(v,w,skc5)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45  100[2:Res:92.1,94.1] || in(u,skc5)* equal(v,skc5)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  102[2:AED:100.1] || in(u,skc5)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  120[2:Res:54.1,102.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,skc5),skc5)**.
% 0.18/0.45  121[2:UnC:120.0,29.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.45  122[1:Spt:121.0,12.0,22.0] || equal(empty_set,skc5)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  123[1:Spt:121.0,12.1,12.2] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc4) equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)**.
% 0.18/0.45  124[2:Spt:123.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc4)**.
% 0.18/0.45  127[2:Rew:124.0,6.0] ||  -> equal(u,skc4) in(skf4(u),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  128[2:Rew:124.0,8.1] || in(u,v)* equal(v,skc4) -> .
% 0.18/0.45  129[2:Rew:124.0,9.0] || equal(skc4,skc4) equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  130[2:Obv:129.0] || equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  131[2:Rew:124.0,130.0] || equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),skc4)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  134[2:Res:127.1,51.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,v),skc4) SkP0(skf4(cartesian_product2(u,v)),v,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  140[0:EqR:20.2] || in(u,v) in(w,x) -> SkP0(ordered_pair(w,u),v,x)*.
% 0.18/0.45  144[2:Res:134.1,13.0] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,v),skc4)** in(skf7(u,w,x),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  154[2:Res:144.1,128.0] || equal(u,skc4) -> equal(cartesian_product2(u,v),skc4)**.
% 0.18/0.45  167[2:SpL:154.1,131.0] || equal(skc4,skc4)* equal(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  168[2:Obv:167.1] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.45  170[2:Spt:168.0,123.0,124.0] || equal(empty_set,skc4)** -> .
% 0.18/0.45  171[2:Spt:168.0,123.1] ||  -> equal(cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5),empty_set)**.
% 0.18/0.45  172[2:SpR:171.0,70.1] || SkP0(u,skc5,skc4)* -> in(u,empty_set).
% 0.18/0.45  175[2:SpL:171.0,51.0] || in(u,empty_set) -> SkP0(u,skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45  176[2:SpL:171.0,16.0] || equal(u,empty_set) SkP0(v,skc5,skc4)* -> in(v,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  178[2:MRR:176.2,8.0] || equal(u,empty_set)* SkP0(v,skc5,skc4)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45  197[2:Res:19.2,172.0] ||  -> equal(u,cartesian_product2(skc4,skc5)) in(skf5(skc4,skc5,u),u)* in(skf5(skc4,skc5,u),empty_set)*.
% 0.18/0.45  199[2:Rew:171.0,197.0] ||  -> equal(u,empty_set) in(skf5(skc4,skc5,u),u)* in(skf5(skc4,skc5,u),empty_set)*.
% 0.18/0.45  201[2:Res:175.1,178.1] || in(u,empty_set)* equal(v,empty_set)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  203[2:AED:201.1] || in(u,empty_set)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  204[2:MRR:172.1,203.0] || SkP0(u,skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  205[2:MRR:199.2,203.0] ||  -> equal(u,empty_set) in(skf5(skc4,skc5,u),u)*.
% 0.18/0.45  236[2:Res:140.2,204.0] || in(u,skc5)*+ in(v,skc4)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  239[2:Res:6.1,236.0] || in(u,skc4)* -> equal(empty_set,skc5).
% 0.18/0.45  241[2:MRR:239.1,122.0] || in(u,skc4)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45  243[2:Res:205.1,241.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc4)**.
% 0.18/0.45  245[2:MRR:243.0,170.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : d1_xboole_0 t113_zfmisc_1 d2_zfmisc_1 antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 0.18/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------