%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SET961+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:25 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.91s 3.52s
% Output : Refutation 6.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 21 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 141 ( 11 ~; 6 |; 6 &; 102 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 45 ( 0 ^; 41 !; 4 ?; 45 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(unordered_pair_decl,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(ordered_pair_decl,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
<=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).
thf(56,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = empty_set )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( A = empty_set ) )
& ( ( A = empty_set )
=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(53,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
<=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(51,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) ) )
=> ( ( A = B )
| ( B = empty_set )
| ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t114_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) ) )
=> ( ( A = B )
| ( B = empty_set )
| ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(13,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) ) )
=> ( ( A = B )
| ( B = empty_set )
| ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(41,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(40,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(67,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,28,53,44,51,37,25,13,41,40,23]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SET961+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.49 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.49 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.49 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.49 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.49 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.49 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.49 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.24/0.49 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:32:15 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.50 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.50 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.41/1.36 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.95/1.65 % [INFO] Parsing done (278ms).
% 1.95/1.67 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.90/2.29 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 3.12/2.30 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.30/2.44 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 10 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.30/2.49 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 3.45/2.53 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 3.45/2.54 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.45/2.54 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.91/3.52 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.91/3.52 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 5.91/3.52 % Time passed: 2803ms (effective reasoning time: 1842ms)
% 5.91/3.52 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.91/3.52 % Axioms used in derivation (10): fc1_zfmisc_1, d1_xboole_0, t2_tarski, commutativity_k2_tarski, l55_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_xboole_0, d5_tarski
% 5.91/3.52 % No. of inferences in proof: 24
% 5.91/3.52 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2803 ms resp. 1842 ms w/o parsing
% 6.10/3.62 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.10/3.62 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------