↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET968+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:09:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   5   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t121_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X3,X4)) = set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X1,X4)),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t121_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t4_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : set_union2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_1) ).

fof(t120_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
      & cartesian_product2(X3,set_union2(X1,X2)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X3,X1),cartesian_product2(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t120_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X3,X4)) = set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X1,X4)),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t121_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] : set_union2(X25,X26) = set_union2(X26,X25),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43] : set_union2(set_union2(X41,X42),X43) = set_union2(X41,set_union2(X42,X43)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36] :
      ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X34,X35),X36) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X34,X36),cartesian_product2(X35,X36))
      & cartesian_product2(X36,set_union2(X34,X35)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X36,X34),cartesian_product2(X36,X35)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t120_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    set_union2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0),set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0),set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0)))) != cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    cartesian_product2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    set_union2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) = set_union2(X3,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0),set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)))) != cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),X4)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET968+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:40:32 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------