↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET974+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:42:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.30s 1.68s
% Output   : Refutation 4.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   7 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  42   ~;  27   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   81 (   0 sgn  72   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ~ ( in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)))
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ~ ( X0 = ordered_pair(X5,X6)
              & in(X5,set_intersection2(X1,X3))
              & in(X6,set_intersection2(X2,X4)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t104_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f11,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( disjoint(X0,X1)
        | disjoint(X2,X3) )
     => disjoint(cartesian_product2(X0,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t127_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( disjoint(X0,X1)
          | disjoint(X2,X3) )
       => disjoint(cartesian_product2(X0,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X0,X1)
          & ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) )
      & ~ ( ? [X2] : in(X2,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
          & disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X0,X1)
          & ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
          & disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)))
      | ? [X5,X6] :
          ( X0 = ordered_pair(X5,X6)
          & in(X5,set_intersection2(X1,X3))
          & in(X6,set_intersection2(X2,X4)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ disjoint(cartesian_product2(X0,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3))
      & ( disjoint(X0,X1)
        | disjoint(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( disjoint(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] : in(X2,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) )
      & ( ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
        | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)))
      | ( ordered_pair(sK2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),sK3(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4)) = X0
        & in(sK2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),set_intersection2(X1,X3))
        & in(sK3(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),set_intersection2(X2,X4)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X5,sK2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4)),skolemize(X6,sK3(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4))],[f18]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(cartesian_product2(sK4,sK6),cartesian_product2(sK5,sK7))
    & ( disjoint(sK4,sK5)
      | disjoint(sK6,sK7) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK4),skolemize(X1,sK5),skolemize(X2,sK6),skolemize(X3,sK7)],[f19]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( disjoint(X0,X1)
        | in(sK8(X0,X1),set_intersection2(X0,X1)) )
      & ( ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
        | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK8]),skolemize(X2,sK8(X0,X1))],[f20]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(sK3(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),set_intersection2(X2,X4))
      | ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(sK2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),set_intersection2(X1,X3))
      | ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( disjoint(sK4,sK5)
    | disjoint(sK6,sK7) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ~ disjoint(cartesian_product2(sK4,sK6),cartesian_product2(sK5,sK7)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X0,X1))
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK8(X0,X1),set_intersection2(X0,X1))
      | disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f43,definition,
    ( spl9_1
  <=> disjoint(sK6,sK7) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl9_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ( disjoint(sK6,sK7)
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f47,definition,
    ( spl9_2
  <=> disjoint(sK4,sK5) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl9_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( disjoint(sK4,sK5)
    | ~ spl9_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( spl9_1
    | spl9_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f38,f47,f43]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X2,X4)
      | ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f35,f40]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X1,X3)
      | ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f36,f40]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK4,X1),cartesian_product2(sK5,X2)))
    | ~ spl9_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f58,f49]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : disjoint(cartesian_product2(sK4,X0),cartesian_product2(sK5,X1))
    | ~ spl9_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f95,f41]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl9_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f101,f39]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ~ spl9_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : ~ in(X0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,sK6),cartesian_product2(X2,sK7)))
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f45,f54]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : disjoint(cartesian_product2(X0,sK6),cartesian_product2(X1,sK7))
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f112,f41]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl9_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f128,f39]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ~ spl9_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f133]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl9_1
    | spl9_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f50]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ~ spl9_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f110]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl9_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f137]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s2,s3]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET974+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:22:17 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226474)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=1812918438:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)First to succeed.
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3226474"
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=2697421973:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226479)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1011937628:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226483)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=759248154:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226480)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=1805659222:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226481)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=1014586931:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)------------------------------
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226482)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226483)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226485)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=640056445:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226485)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 4.30/1.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 4.30/1.68  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)------------------------------
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Termination reason: Refutation
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Peak memory usage: 90 MB
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)------------------------------
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226484)------------------------------
% 4.30/1.68  % (3226474)Success in time 0.515 s
% 4.30/1.68  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------