↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET976+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.80s 2.47s
% Output   : Refutation 4.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  156 (   8   ~;   0   |;  12   &; 119   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0   ^;  43   !;   4   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ordered_pair_decl,type,
    ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
    cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

thf(unordered_pair_decl,type,
    unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
    <=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
        & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
          & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) )
       => ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
      & ( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
       => ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
          & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
    <=> ( ( B = D )
        & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
        ( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
      <=> ( ( B = D )
          & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
        ( ( ( ( B = D )
            & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) )
         => ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
        & ( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
         => ( ( B = D )
            & ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B
        = ( A @ singleton ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
        <=> ( C = A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C = A )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( C = A ) ) )
       => ( B
          = ( A @ singleton ) ) )
      & ( ( B
          = ( A @ singleton ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C = A )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( C = A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[60,21,53,50,11,26,23,47,62]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET976+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.40  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:29:31 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.88/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (191ms). 
% 1.41/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.01/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.01/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.21/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.21/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.21/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.21/1.80  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.80/2.47  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.80/2.47  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.80/2.47  % Time passed: 1919ms (effective reasoning time: 1258ms)
% 3.80/2.47  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.80/2.47  % Axioms used in derivation (8): d5_tarski, commutativity_k2_tarski, l55_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_zfmisc_1, d1_tarski
% 3.80/2.47  % No. of inferences in proof: 20
% 3.80/2.47  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1919 ms resp. 1258 ms w/o parsing
% 4.07/2.52  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.07/2.52  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------