↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET977+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:09:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.23s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  36   ~;  25   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   4 sgn  35   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t128_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X3),X4))
    <=> ( X1 = X3
        & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t128_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(t130_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 != empty_set
     => ( cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X1) != empty_set
        & cartesian_product2(X1,singleton(X2)) != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t130_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t129_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X4)))
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & X2 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43,X44] :
      ( ( X41 = X43
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X41,X42),cartesian_product2(singleton(X43),X44)) )
      & ( in(X42,X44)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X41,X42),cartesian_product2(singleton(X43),X44)) )
      & ( X41 != X43
        | ~ in(X42,X44)
        | in(ordered_pair(X41,X42),cartesian_product2(singleton(X43),X44)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t128_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] : ordered_pair(X35,X36) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X35,X36),singleton(X35)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X4))
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] : unordered_pair(X29,X30) = unordered_pair(X30,X29),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( X1 != empty_set
       => ( cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X1) != empty_set
          & cartesian_product2(X1,singleton(X2)) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t130_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( X31 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X32,X31) )
      & ( in(esk1_1(X33),X33)
        | X33 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X45,X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ( in(X45,X47)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X45,X46),cartesian_product2(X47,singleton(X48))) )
      & ( X46 = X48
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X45,X46),cartesian_product2(X47,singleton(X48))) )
      & ( ~ in(X45,X47)
        | X46 != X48
        | in(ordered_pair(X45,X46),cartesian_product2(X47,singleton(X48))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t129_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X4))
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X3,X4) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 != empty_set
    & ( cartesian_product2(singleton(esk5_0),esk4_0) = empty_set
      | cartesian_product2(esk4_0,singleton(esk5_0)) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X4)))
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X3))
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( cartesian_product2(singleton(esk5_0),esk4_0) = empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk4_0,singleton(esk5_0)) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X4)))
    | X3 != X4
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( cartesian_product2(esk4_0,singleton(esk5_0)) = empty_set
    | ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(esk1_1(X1),X1)
    | X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X2)))
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(esk4_0,singleton(esk5_0)) = empty_set,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(X1,esk4_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET977+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:41:32 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.23/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.23/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.23/1.71  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------