↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET977+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:15:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  36   ~;  21   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   4 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t130_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 != empty_set
     => ( cartesian_product2(X1,singleton(X2)) != empty_set
        & cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X1) != empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t130_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t128_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X3),X4))
    <=> ( in(X2,X4)
        & X1 = X3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t128_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t129_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X4)))
    <=> ( X2 = X4
        & in(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( X1 != empty_set
       => ( cartesian_product2(X1,singleton(X2)) != empty_set
          & cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X1) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t130_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(X11,X12),cartesian_product2(singleton(X13),X14))
        | ~ in(X12,X14)
        | X11 != X13 )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,X12),cartesian_product2(singleton(X13),X14))
        | in(X12,X14) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,X12),cartesian_product2(singleton(X13),X14))
        | X11 = X13 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t128_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( X1 != empty_set
       => ( cartesian_product2(X1,singleton(X2)) != empty_set
          & cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X1) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( X9 = empty_set
        | in(esk3_1(X9),X9) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,X4)
    | X1 != X2
    | in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( cartesian_product2(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) = empty_set
      | cartesian_product2(singleton(esk2_0),esk1_0) = empty_set )
    & esk1_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X1)
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),cartesian_product2(X17,singleton(X18)))
        | X16 != X18
        | ~ in(X15,X17) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),cartesian_product2(X17,singleton(X18)))
        | X16 = X18 )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),cartesian_product2(X17,singleton(X18)))
        | in(X15,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t129_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X3)
    | in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( cartesian_product2(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) = empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(singleton(esk2_0),esk1_0) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X3 != X4
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X4))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk1_0)
    | cartesian_product2(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) = empty_set ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk3_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X2))) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) = empty_set,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(X1,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET977+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:45:50 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % new_bool_3 with pid 2371997 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2372004 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.14/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 10
% 0.14/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 28
% 0.14/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 38
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 35
% 0.14/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 35
% 0.14/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.14/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.14/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 32
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 61
% 0.14/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61
% 0.14/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.14/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.14/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1206
% 0.14/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 193
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------