%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SET977+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:27 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.50s 3.18s
% Output : Refutation 5.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 50 ( 22 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 166 ( 20 ~; 0 |; 12 &; 120 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 0 ^; 43 !; 4 ?; 47 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(unordered_pair_decl,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(ordered_pair_decl,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(43,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
<=> ( ( B = D )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( ( B = D )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) )
=> ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
=> ( ( B = D )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(37,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = empty_set )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( A = empty_set ) )
& ( ( A = empty_set )
=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ singleton @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
<=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( A = C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t128_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( A = C ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ singleton @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( ( D @ ( C @ singleton @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( A = C ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A != empty_set )
=> ( ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
!= empty_set )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ singleton @ cartesian_product2 ) )
!= empty_set ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t130_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A != empty_set )
=> ( ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
!= empty_set )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ singleton @ cartesian_product2 ) )
!= empty_set ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(13,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A != empty_set )
=> ( ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
!= empty_set )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ singleton @ cartesian_product2 ) )
!= empty_set ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(41,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(64,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[38,34,22,43,55,37,25,20,46,13,41]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SET977+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.49 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.49 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.49 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.49 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.49 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.49 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.49 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:26:54 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.50 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.50 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.44/1.35 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.96/1.63 % [INFO] Parsing done (277ms).
% 1.96/1.65 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.70/2.12 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.91/2.13 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.10/2.21 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 10 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.10/2.23 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 3.10/2.26 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 3.10/2.26 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.10/2.26 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.50/3.18 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.50/3.18 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 5.50/3.18 % Time passed: 2466ms (effective reasoning time: 1518ms)
% 5.50/3.18 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.50/3.18 % Axioms used in derivation (10): fc1_zfmisc_1, t129_zfmisc_1, d1_xboole_0, t128_zfmisc_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_xboole_0, d5_tarski
% 5.50/3.18 % No. of inferences in proof: 24
% 5.50/3.18 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2466 ms resp. 1518 ms w/o parsing
% 5.62/3.26 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.62/3.26 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------