↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:23:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem    : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 12:00:23 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.50  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.52  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.52  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.16/0.52  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.52  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.16/0.52  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.16/0.52  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.52  
% 0.16/0.52  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.52  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.52  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.53  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.53  % File     : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.16/0.53  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.16/0.53  % Problem  : Basic properties of sets, theorem 132
% 0.16/0.53  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.16/0.53  % English  :
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.16/0.53  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.53  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.16/0.53  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t132_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.16/0.53  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.19 v7.5.0, 0.22 v7.4.0, 0.13 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.1.0, 0.09 v7.0.0, 0.10 v6.4.0, 0.12 v6.2.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.19 v5.4.0, 0.21 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.15 v5.1.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.12 v4.1.0, 0.17 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.4.0, 0.16 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0
% 0.16/0.53  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Number of atoms       :   14 (   8 equ)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
% 0.16/0.53  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   4 avg)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.53  %            Number of variables   :   20 (  18   !;   2   ?)
% 0.16/0.53  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.16/0.53  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.16/0.53  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.53  fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(fc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B] :
% 0.16/0.53        ( ~ empty(A)
% 0.16/0.53       => ~ empty(set_union2(A,B)) ) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(fc3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B] :
% 0.16/0.53        ( ~ empty(A)
% 0.16/0.53       => ~ empty(set_union2(B,A)) ) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,A) = A ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(t120_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.16/0.53        ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(A,B),C) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(A,C),cartesian_product2(B,C))
% 0.16/0.53        & cartesian_product2(C,set_union2(A,B)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(C,A),cartesian_product2(C,B)) ) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(t132_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.16/0.53        ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(A),C),cartesian_product2(singleton(B),C))
% 0.16/0.53        & cartesian_product2(C,unordered_pair(A,B)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(C,singleton(A)),cartesian_product2(C,singleton(B))) ) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  fof(t41_enumset1,axiom,
% 0.16/0.53      ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = set_union2(singleton(A),singleton(B)) ).
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.53  % Proof found
% 0.16/0.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.53  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.53  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.16/0.53  %VarNum:27(SingletonVarNum:13)
% 0.16/0.53  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.16/0.53  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.16/0.53  %SharedTerms:26
% 0.16/0.53  %goalClause: 19
% 0.16/0.53  [10]P1(a1)
% 0.16/0.53  [16]~P1(a4)
% 0.16/0.53  [11]E(f3(x111,x111),x111)
% 0.16/0.53  [12]E(f3(x121,x122),f3(x122,x121))
% 0.16/0.53  [14]E(f3(f2(x141,x142),f2(x141,x143)),f2(x141,f3(x142,x143)))
% 0.16/0.53  [15]E(f3(f2(x151,x152),f2(x153,x152)),f2(f3(x151,x153),x152))
% 0.16/0.53  [19]~E(f3(f2(a5,f11(a6)),f2(a5,f11(a10))),f2(a5,f3(f11(a6),f11(a10))))+~E(f3(f2(f11(a7),a8),f2(f11(a9),a8)),f2(f3(f11(a7),f11(a9)),a8))
% 0.16/0.53  [17]P1(x171)+~P1(f3(x172,x171))
% 0.16/0.53  [18]P1(x181)+~P1(f3(x181,x182))
% 0.16/0.53  %EqnAxiom
% 0.16/0.53  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.16/0.53  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.16/0.53  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.16/0.53  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43),f3(x42,x43))
% 0.16/0.53  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51),f3(x53,x52))
% 0.16/0.53  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x61,x63),f2(x62,x63))
% 0.16/0.53  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x73,x71),f2(x73,x72))
% 0.16/0.53  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f11(x81),f11(x82))
% 0.16/0.53  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.53  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.16/0.53     ($false),
% 0.16/0.53     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,15,19]),
% 0.16/0.53     ['proof']).
% 0.16/0.53  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.53  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------