↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET983+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.56s 1.43s
% Output   : Refutation 2.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   9 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  162 (   6   ~;   0   |;  11   &; 132   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0   ^;  43   !;   4   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
    cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(set_intersection2_decl,type,
    set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
      ( ( ( E @ ( D @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) )
        & ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) ) )
     => ( E @ ( C @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( D @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t137_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( ( ( E @ ( D @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) )
          & ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) ) )
       => ( E @ ( C @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( D @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( ( ( E @ ( D @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) )
          & ( C @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) ) )
       => ( E @ ( C @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( D @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C
        = ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) )
    <=> ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
        <=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
            & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) )
       => ( C
          = ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C
          = ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) )
       => ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) @ cartesian_product2 ) )
      = ( D @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t123_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) @ cartesian_product2 ) )
      = ( D @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,52,20,17,50,55,47,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET983+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.40  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:33:31 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.69/0.71  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.69/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (88ms). 
% 0.93/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.14/0.99  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.14/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.41/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.41/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.41/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 1.41/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.41/1.07  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.56/1.43  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.56/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.56/1.43  % Time passed: 928ms (effective reasoning time: 626ms)
% 2.56/1.43  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.56/1.43  % Axioms used in derivation (7): idempotence_k3_xboole_0, commutativity_k3_xboole_0, t123_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, d3_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 2.56/1.43  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 2.56/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 928 ms resp. 626 ms w/o parsing
% 2.56/1.46  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.56/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------