↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET983+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  15   ~;   6   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  20   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_intersection2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t123_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] : cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(A,B),set_intersection2(C,D)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(A,C),cartesian_product2(B,D)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t123_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t137_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C,D,E] :
      ( ( in(A,cartesian_product2(D,E))
        & in(A,cartesian_product2(B,C)) )
     => in(A,cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(B,D),set_intersection2(C,E))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t137_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t137_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D,E] :
        ( ( in(A,cartesian_product2(D,E))
          & in(A,cartesian_product2(B,C)) )
       => in(A,cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(B,D),set_intersection2(C,E))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t137_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,B)
    | ~ in(D,A)
    | in(D,C)
    | set_intersection2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(A,B),set_intersection2(C,D)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(A,C),cartesian_product2(B,D)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t123_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_8,plain,
    ? [A,B,C,D,E] :
      ( ~ in(A,cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(B,D),set_intersection2(C,E)))
      & in(A,cartesian_product2(D,E))
      & in(A,cartesian_product2(B,C)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t137_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t137_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0,cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(sK1,sK3),set_intersection2(sK2,sK4)))
    & in(sK0,cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4))
    & in(sK0,cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2),skolemize(D,sK3),skolemize(E,sK4)],[nnf_8]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK0,cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t137_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK0,cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t137_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(sK1,sK3),set_intersection2(sK2,sK4))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t137_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2),cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK0,B)
    | ~ in(sK0,A)
    | set_intersection2(A,B) != set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2),cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK0,A)
    | set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4),A) != set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2),cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4),cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2)) != set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2),cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2),cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4)) != set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK1,sK2),cartesian_product2(sK3,sK4)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET983+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:28:45 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.38  % Process 45549 was started by sandbox2 on n011,
% 0.11/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 08:28:45 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.11/0.40  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.11/0.40  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.11/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.11/0.40  % Given clauses 15.
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------