↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET984+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (  62 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (  20   ~;  31   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   6 sgn  24   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t113_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set
    <=> ( B = empty_set
        | A = empty_set ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t123_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] : cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(A,B),set_intersection2(C,D)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(A,C),cartesian_product2(B,D)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t123_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t134_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( cartesian_product2(A,B) = cartesian_product2(C,D)
     => ( ( B = D
          & A = C )
        | B = empty_set
        | A = empty_set ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t134_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t17_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(set_intersection2(A,B),A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t17_xboole_1) ).

fof(t28_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
     => set_intersection2(A,B) = A ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t28_xboole_1) ).

fof(t138_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( subset(cartesian_product2(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
     => ( ( subset(B,D)
          & subset(A,C) )
        | cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t138_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t138_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ( subset(cartesian_product2(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
       => ( ( subset(B,D)
            & subset(A,C) )
          | cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t138_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( empty_set != A
    | cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t113_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( empty_set != B
    | cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t113_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(A,B),set_intersection2(C,D)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(A,C),cartesian_product2(B,D)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t123_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) = cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(A,C),set_intersection2(B,D)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_21]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( A = C
    | empty_set = D
    | empty_set = C
    | cartesian_product2(A,B) != cartesian_product2(C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t134_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( B = D
    | empty_set = D
    | empty_set = C
    | cartesian_product2(A,B) != cartesian_product2(C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t134_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    subset(set_intersection2(A,B),A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t17_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(A,B) = A
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t28_xboole_1]) ).

fof(nnf_11,plain,
    ? [A,B,C,D] :
      ( ( ~ subset(B,D)
        | ~ subset(A,C) )
      & cartesian_product2(A,B) != empty_set
      & subset(cartesian_product2(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t138_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t138_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ subset(sK1,sK3)
      | ~ subset(sK0,sK2) )
    & cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1) != empty_set
    & subset(cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1),cartesian_product2(sK2,sK3)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2),skolemize(D,sK3)],[nnf_11]) ).

cnf(c_27,negated_conjecture,
    subset(cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1),cartesian_product2(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t138_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t138_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK1,sK3)
    | ~ subset(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t138_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    subset(set_intersection2(A,B),B),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_195,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1),cartesian_product2(sK2,sK3)) = cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(sK0,sK2),set_intersection2(sK1,sK3)) = cartesian_product2(sK0,sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_195]) ).

cnf(c_196,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_196]) ).

cnf(c_197,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_197]) ).

cnf(c_198,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK1,sK3) = sK1
    | empty_set = sK1
    | empty_set = sK0 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_199,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK1,sK3) = sK1
    | empty_set = sK1
    | sK0 = empty_set ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_198]) ).

cnf(c_200,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK1,sK3) = sK1
    | sK1 = empty_set
    | sK0 = empty_set ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_199]) ).

cnf(c_201,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK1,sK3) = sK1
    | sK1 = empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_200]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    set_intersection2(sK1,sK3) = sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_201]) ).

cnf(c_202,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK0,sK2) = sK0
    | empty_set = sK1
    | empty_set = sK0 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_203,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK0,sK2) = sK0
    | empty_set = sK1
    | sK0 = empty_set ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_202]) ).

cnf(c_204,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK0,sK2) = sK0
    | sK1 = empty_set
    | sK0 = empty_set ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_203]) ).

cnf(c_205,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK0,sK2) = sK0
    | sK1 = empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_204]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    set_intersection2(sK0,sK2) = sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_205]) ).

cnf(c_192,plain,
    subset(sK1,sK3),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_193,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK0,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_192,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_206,plain,
    subset(sK0,sK2),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_194,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_206]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET984+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:30:24 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.37  % Process 2446968 was started by sandbox2 on n003,
% 0.08/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:30:24 2026
% 0.08/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Proof 1 at 0.05 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.13/0.44  % Length of proof is 28.
% 0.13/0.44  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum clause weight is 30.000.
% 0.13/0.44  % Given clauses 43.
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------