↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET985+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:23:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.03s 3.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SET985+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 17:26:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.44/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 3.03/3.11  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.11  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 3.03/3.11  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 3.03/3.11  % Transform   :cnf
% 3.03/3.11  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 3.03/3.11  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  % Result      :Theorem 2.500000s
% 3.03/3.11  % Output      :CNFRefutation 2.500000s
% 3.03/3.11  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.11  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.11  % File     : SET985+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 3.03/3.11  % Domain   : Set theory
% 3.03/3.11  % Problem  : Basic properties of sets, theorem 139
% 3.03/3.11  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 3.03/3.11  % English  :
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 3.03/3.11  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 3.03/3.11  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 3.03/3.11  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t139_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  % Status   : Theorem
% 3.03/3.11  % Rating   : 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.07 v7.1.0, 0.09 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.16 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.4.0, 0.14 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.08 v4.1.0, 0.13 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0
% 3.03/3.11  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   5 unt;   0 def)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Number of atoms       :   16 (   4 equ)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Number of connectives :   10 (   2   ~;   3   |;   1   &)
% 3.03/3.11  %                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 3.03/3.11  %            Number of variables   :   15 (  13   !;   2   ?)
% 3.03/3.11  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 3.03/3.11  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 3.03/3.11  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.11  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      empty(empty_set) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(t113_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      ! [A,B] :
% 3.03/3.11        ( cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set
% 3.03/3.11      <=> ( A = empty_set
% 3.03/3.11          | B = empty_set ) ) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(t138_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      ! [A,B,C,D] :
% 3.03/3.11        ( subset(cartesian_product2(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
% 3.03/3.11       => ( cartesian_product2(A,B) = empty_set
% 3.03/3.11          | ( subset(A,C)
% 3.03/3.11            & subset(B,D) ) ) ) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(t139_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 3.03/3.11      ! [A] :
% 3.03/3.11        ( ~ empty(A)
% 3.03/3.11       => ! [B,C,D] :
% 3.03/3.11            ( ( subset(cartesian_product2(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
% 3.03/3.11              | subset(cartesian_product2(B,A),cartesian_product2(D,C)) )
% 3.03/3.11           => subset(B,D) ) ) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  fof(t2_xboole_1,axiom,
% 3.03/3.11      ! [A] : subset(empty_set,A) ).
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.11  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.11  % Proof found
% 3.03/3.11  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.03/3.11  % SZS output start Proof
% 3.03/3.11  %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:8)
% 3.03/3.11  %VarNum:29(SingletonVarNum:16)
% 3.03/3.11  %MaxLitNum:3
% 3.03/3.11  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 3.03/3.11  %SharedTerms:18
% 3.03/3.11  %goalClause: 14 15 19
% 3.03/3.11  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 3.03/3.11  [9]P1(a1)
% 3.03/3.11  [10]P1(a3)
% 3.03/3.11  [13]~P1(a4)
% 3.03/3.11  [14]~P1(a5)
% 3.03/3.11  [15]~P2(a6,a7)
% 3.03/3.11  [11]P2(a1,x111)
% 3.03/3.11  [12]P2(x121,x121)
% 3.03/3.11  [19]P2(f2(a5,a6),f2(a8,a7))+P2(f2(a6,a5),f2(a7,a8))
% 3.03/3.11  [16]~E(x162,a1)+E(f2(x161,x162),a1)
% 3.03/3.11  [17]~E(x171,a1)+E(f2(x171,x172),a1)
% 3.03/3.11  [18]E(x181,a1)+E(x182,a1)+~E(f2(x182,x181),a1)
% 3.03/3.11  [20]P2(x202,x203)+~P2(f2(x201,x202),f2(x204,x203))+E(f2(x201,x202),a1)
% 3.03/3.11  [21]P2(x211,x213)+~P2(f2(x211,x212),f2(x213,x214))+E(f2(x211,x212),a1)
% 3.03/3.11  %EqnAxiom
% 3.03/3.11  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 3.03/3.11  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 3.03/3.11  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 3.03/3.11  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 3.03/3.11  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 3.03/3.11  [6]~P1(x61)+P1(x62)+~E(x61,x62)
% 3.03/3.11  [7]P2(x72,x73)+~E(x71,x72)+~P2(x71,x73)
% 3.03/3.11  [8]P2(x83,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x83,x81)
% 3.03/3.11  
% 3.03/3.11  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(22,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(f2(x221,a1),a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(equality_inference,[],[16])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(23,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(f2(a1,x231),a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(equality_inference,[],[17])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(24,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(a1,f2(x241,a1))),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,2])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(33,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (~E(a1,a6)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,11,23,24,9,2,3,6,7])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(40,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (P2(f2(a6,a5),f2(a7,a8))+E(f2(a5,a6),a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,19,20])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(384,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(f2(a5,a6),a1)+E(f2(a6,a5),a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,40,21])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(385,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(a5,a1)+E(a6,a1)+E(f2(a5,a6),a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[384,18])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(386,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(a6,a1)+E(a5,a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[385,18])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(387,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     (E(a5,a1)),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[33,386,2])).
% 3.03/3.12  cnf(389,plain,
% 3.03/3.12     ($false),
% 3.03/3.12     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,387,9,2,6]),
% 3.03/3.12     ['proof']).
% 3.03/3.12  % SZS output end Proof
% 3.03/3.12  % Total time :2.500000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------