↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET985+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:31:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.23s 2.55s
% Output   : Refutation 3.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  118 (   7   ~;   8   |;   3   &;  89   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0   ^;  29   !;   4   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
    cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(empty_set_decl,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ empty )
     => ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( C @ ( D @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) )
            | ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) ) )
         => ( D @ ( B @ subset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t139_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ~ ( A @ empty )
       => ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( C @ ( D @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) )
              | ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) ) )
           => ( D @ ( B @ subset ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ~ ( A @ empty )
       => ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
            ( ( ( C @ ( D @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) )
              | ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) ) )
           => ( D @ ( B @ subset ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) )
     => ( ( ( D @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
          = empty_set ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t138_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) )
     => ( ( ( D @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
        | ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
          = empty_set ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    empty_set @ empty,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(15,plain,
    empty_set @ empty,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( empty_set @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_xboole_1) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( empty_set @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
        = empty_set )
    <=> ( ( B = empty_set )
        | ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B = empty_set )
          | ( A = empty_set ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
          = empty_set ) )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) )
          = empty_set )
       => ( ( B = empty_set )
          | ( A = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,21,34,18,16,15,40,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET985+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/0.61  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.61  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.61  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.61  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.61  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.61  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.61  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.61  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:29:17 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.61  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.61  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.18/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (184ms). 
% 1.18/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.75/1.79  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.92/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.09/1.90  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.09/1.93  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.09/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.09/1.95  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.09/1.96  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.23/2.55  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.23/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.23/2.55  % Time passed: 1797ms (effective reasoning time: 1148ms)
% 3.23/2.55  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.23/2.55  % Axioms used in derivation (7): t138_zfmisc_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t2_xboole_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, fc1_xboole_0, t113_zfmisc_1
% 3.23/2.55  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 3.23/2.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1797 ms resp. 1148 ms w/o parsing
% 3.23/2.60  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.23/2.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------