↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET988+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:09:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   98 (  37   ~;  37   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   4 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t2_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ! [X2] :
            ~ ( in(X2,X1)
              & ! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) != X2 )
        & ! [X2,X3,X4] :
            ( ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
              & in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X1) )
           => X3 = X4 ) )
     => ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_funct_1) ).

fof(d1_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ~ ( in(X2,X1)
            & ! [X3,X4] : X2 != ordered_pair(X3,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d1_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( function(X1)
    <=> ! [X2,X3,X4] :
          ( ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
            & in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X1) )
         => X3 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_funct_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ! [X2] :
              ~ ( in(X2,X1)
                & ! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) != X2 )
          & ! [X2,X3,X4] :
              ( ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                & in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X1) )
             => X3 = X4 ) )
       => ( relation(X1)
          & function(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t2_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X124,X125,X128,X130,X131] :
      ( ( ~ relation(X124)
        | ~ in(X125,X124)
        | X125 = ordered_pair(esk16_2(X124,X125),esk17_2(X124,X125)) )
      & ( in(esk18_1(X128),X128)
        | relation(X128) )
      & ( esk18_1(X128) != ordered_pair(X130,X131)
        | relation(X128) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X107,X108] : ordered_pair(X107,X108) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X107,X108),singleton(X107)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X110,X113,X114,X115] :
      ( ( ~ in(X110,esk10_0)
        | ordered_pair(esk11_1(X110),esk12_1(X110)) = X110 )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X113,X114),esk10_0)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X113,X115),esk10_0)
        | X114 = X115 )
      & ( ~ relation(esk10_0)
        | ~ function(esk10_0) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( relation(X1)
    | esk18_1(X1) != ordered_pair(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X66,X67] : unordered_pair(X66,X67) = unordered_pair(X67,X66),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_pair(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,esk10_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( relation(X1)
    | esk18_1(X1) != unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X3),singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),singleton(esk11_1(X1))) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,esk10_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X116,X117,X118,X119,X120] :
      ( ( ~ function(X116)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X117,X118),X116)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X117,X119),X116)
        | X118 = X119 )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk13_1(X120),esk14_1(X120)),X120)
        | function(X120) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk13_1(X120),esk15_1(X120)),X120)
        | function(X120) )
      & ( esk14_1(X120) != esk15_1(X120)
        | function(X120) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_funct_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( relation(X1)
    | esk18_1(X1) != unordered_pair(singleton(X2),unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(singleton(esk11_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1))) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,esk10_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk10_0)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),esk10_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk13_1(X1),esk14_1(X1)),X1)
    | function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(X1)
    | ~ in(esk18_1(X1),esk10_0) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( in(esk18_1(X1),X1)
    | relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),esk10_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk10_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( function(X1)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk13_1(X1),esk14_1(X1)),singleton(esk13_1(X1))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relation(esk10_0)
    | ~ function(esk10_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk10_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk13_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)),X1)
    | function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,X2)),esk10_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,X1)),esk10_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk13_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk13_1(X1),esk14_1(X1))),X1)
    | function(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ function(esk10_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( function(X1)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk13_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)),singleton(esk13_1(X1))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk14_1(esk10_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk13_1(esk10_0)),unordered_pair(esk13_1(esk10_0),X1)),esk10_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk13_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk13_1(X1),esk15_1(X1))),X1)
    | function(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( function(X1)
    | esk14_1(X1) != esk15_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    esk15_1(esk10_0) = esk14_1(esk10_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET988+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:41:17 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------