%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SEU009+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.58s 1.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 72 ( 21 unt; 5 def)
% Number of atoms : 345 ( 44 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 376 ( 155 ~; 157 |; 48 &)
% ( 8 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 2 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 6 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 94 ( 0 sgn 79 !; 15 ?; 22 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X0] :
( function(identity_relation(X0))
& relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( X1 = identity_relation(X0)
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( in(X2,X0)
=> apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).
fof(f31,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_funct_1) ).
fof(f32,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f31]) ).
fof(f58,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f59,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f58]) ).
fof(f62,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( X1 = identity_relation(X0)
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( ~ in(X2,X0)
| apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( X1 = identity_relation(X0)
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( ~ in(X2,X0)
| apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f62]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
<~> ( in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
<~> ( in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f82]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( ( identity_relation(X0) != X1
| ( ! [X2] :
( ~ in(X2,X0)
| apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
& ( ? [X2] :
( in(X2,X0)
& apply(X1,X2) != X2 )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0
| X1 = identity_relation(X0) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( ( identity_relation(X0) != X1
| ( ! [X2] :
( ~ in(X2,X0)
| apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
& ( ? [X2] :
( in(X2,X0)
& apply(X1,X2) != X2 )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0
| X1 = identity_relation(X0) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( ( identity_relation(X0) != X1
| ( ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,X0)
| apply(X1,X3) = X3 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
& ( ? [X2] :
( in(X2,X0)
& apply(X1,X2) != X2 )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0
| X1 = identity_relation(X0) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( ( identity_relation(X0) != X1
| ( ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,X0)
| apply(X1,X3) = X3 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
& ( ( in(sK9(X0,X1),X0)
& sK9(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK9(X0,X1)) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0
| X1 = identity_relation(X0) ) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9]),skolemize(X2,sK9(X0,X1))],[f86]) ).
fof(f88,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
| ( in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
| ( in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X0))))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X1),X0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f88]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
( function(sK12)
& relation(sK12)
& ( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| ( in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
& in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ) )
& ( ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11,sK12]),skolemize(X0,sK10),skolemize(X1,sK11),skolemize(X2,sK12)],[f89]) ).
fof(f105,plain,
! [X0] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f106,plain,
! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f131,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| identity_relation(X0) != X1
| relation_dom(X1) = X0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f138,plain,
function(sK12),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f139,plain,
relation(sK12),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f142,plain,
( ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f150,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
| relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f134]) ).
tcf(c_63,plain,
! [X0: $i] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
! [X0: $i] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).
tcf(c_87,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X2)))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(apply(X0,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).
tcf(c_88,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).
tcf(c_89,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( in(apply(X1,X0),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).
tcf(c_93,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0 )
| ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
| ~ function(identity_relation(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150]) ).
tcf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12))
| ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10)))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).
tcf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
( in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12))
| in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10)))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).
tcf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
( in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10)))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).
tcf(c_99,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK12),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).
tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
function(sK12),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).
tcf(c_136,plain,
! [X0: $i] : relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_64,c_63,c_93]) ).
tcf(c_992,definition,
iPr_def_10 = identity_relation(sK10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_993,definition,
iPr_def_11 = relation_composition(sK12,iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_994,definition,
iPr_def_12 = relation_dom(iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_995,definition,
iPr_def_13 = apply(sK12,sK11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_996,definition,
iPr_def_14 = relation_dom(sK12),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_997,negated_conjecture,
function(sK12),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).
tcf(c_998,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK12),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).
tcf(c_999,negated_conjecture,
( in(iPr_def_13,sK10)
| in(sK11,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_995,c_992,c_993,c_994]) ).
tcf(c_1000,negated_conjecture,
( in(sK11,iPr_def_14)
| in(sK11,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_996]) ).
tcf(c_1001,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(iPr_def_13,sK10)
| ~ in(sK11,iPr_def_14)
| ~ in(sK11,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_96]) ).
tcf(c_1655,plain,
function(iPr_def_10),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_992,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_1656,plain,
relation(iPr_def_10),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_992,c_63]) ).
tcf(c_1657,plain,
relation_dom(iPr_def_10) = sK10,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_992,c_136]) ).
tcf(c_2274,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(X0,relation_dom(sK12))
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(sK12)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_993,c_88]) ).
tcf(c_2275,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(X0,iPr_def_14)
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(sK12)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2274,c_994,c_996]) ).
tcf(c_2276,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(X0,iPr_def_14)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2275,c_1656,c_998,c_1655,c_997]) ).
tcf(c_2316,plain,
in(sK11,iPr_def_14),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1000,c_2276]) ).
tcf(c_2377,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(apply(sK12,X0),relation_dom(iPr_def_10))
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(sK12)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_993,c_89]) ).
tcf(c_2378,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(apply(sK12,X0),sK10)
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(sK12)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2377,c_994,c_1657]) ).
tcf(c_2379,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(apply(sK12,X0),sK10)
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2378,c_1656,c_998,c_1655,c_997]) ).
tcf(c_2438,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,X0)))
| ~ relation(sK12)
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12))
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_995,c_87]) ).
tcf(c_2446,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,X0)))
| ~ relation(sK12)
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(sK11,iPr_def_14)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2438,c_996]) ).
tcf(c_2447,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,X0)))
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2446,c_998,c_997,c_2316]) ).
tcf(c_2565,plain,
( in(iPr_def_13,sK10)
| ~ in(sK11,iPr_def_12) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_995,c_2379]) ).
tcf(c_2605,plain,
( in(sK11,relation_dom(iPr_def_11))
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_993,c_2447]) ).
tcf(c_2612,plain,
( in(sK11,iPr_def_12)
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,sK10) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2605,c_994,c_1657]) ).
tcf(c_2613,plain,
( in(sK11,iPr_def_12)
| ~ in(iPr_def_13,sK10) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2612,c_1656,c_1655]) ).
tcf(c_2706,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2613,c_2565,c_2316,c_1001,c_999]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU009+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.39 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:36:10 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.48
% 0.11/0.48 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.48
% 0.11/0.48 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.20/0.50 % Proving...
% 2.58/1.26 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.58/1.26 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.58/1.26 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.58/1.26 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Parsing...
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Proving...
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 %
% 2.58/1.26 % clauses 56
% 2.58/1.26 % conjectures 5
% 2.58/1.26 % EPR 24
% 2.58/1.26 % Horn 51
% 2.58/1.26 % unary 26
% 2.58/1.26 % binary 13
% 2.58/1.26 % lits 117
% 2.58/1.26 % lits eq 12
% 2.58/1.26 % fd_pure 0
% 2.58/1.26 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.58/1.26 % fd_cond 1
% 2.58/1.26 % fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.58/1.26 % AC symbols 0
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------
% 2.58/1.26 % Current options:
% 2.58/1.26 % ------
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 %
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % ------ Proving...
% 2.58/1.26 %
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.58/1.26
% 2.58/1.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.58/1.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------